{"bill":{"id":"119-hr-1574","congress":119,"type":"HR","number":1574,"title":"RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025","originChamber":"House","introducedDate":"2025-02-25","sponsors":[{"bioguideId":"M001224","fullName":"Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]","party":"R","state":"TX","district":1}],"cosponsorsCount":5,"latestAction":{"actionDate":"2025-02-25","text":"Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary."},"policyArea":"Commerce","subjects":[],"actions":[{"date":"2025-02-25","text":"Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.","type":"IntroReferral","chamber":"House floor actions","hasVote":false},{"date":"2025-02-25","text":"Introduced in House","type":"IntroReferral","chamber":"Library of Congress","hasVote":false},{"date":"2025-02-25","text":"Introduced in House","type":"IntroReferral","chamber":"Library of Congress","hasVote":false}],"summary":"<p><strong>Realizing Engineering, Science, and Technology Opportunities by Restoring Exclusive Patent Rights Act of 2025 or the RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025</strong></p><p>This bill establishes a rebuttable presumption for injunctive relief in patent infringement cases. Specifically, if a court enters a final judgment finding infringement of a right secured by patent, the patent owner shall be entitled to a rebuttable presumption that the court should grant a permanent injunction with respect to that infringing conduct.</p><p>(In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court held in&nbsp;<em>eBay&nbsp;v. MercExchange</em> that patent holders do not have an automatic right to a permanent injunction in a patent infringement case.)</p>","updateDate":"2025-12-05T22:08:59Z"},"markets":[],"stateBills":[],"meta":{"sources":["congress.gov"],"latencyMs":334,"ts":"2026-04-15T20:39:26.686Z"},"nextActions":{"inspect":[],"related":[{"description":"Search related legislation","method":"GET","url":"/api/public/query-gov?q=RESTORE%20Patent%20Rights%20Act%20of%202025"}]}}