Alternative · AI agent
Astron vs
SimpleFunctions.
Both SimpleFunctions and Astron approach prediction markets from an AI-agent angle, but the surface layer differs sharply. Astron's Raven 1.0 packages sentiment analysis and tokenized automated strategies for traders who want a pre-built product. SimpleFunctions ships the infrastructure layer beneath that: causal-tree thesis decomposition with auto-evaluation cycles, Portfolio Autopilot with a 7-gate risk cascade, computed indicators across 48K+ contracts, a 56-tool MCP server, and live Brier scores that agents and researchers can audit themselves.
Verified 2026-04 · public sources only · live SF data from /calibration
Verdict
Pick the one that fits how
you actually work.
Choose SimpleFunctions if
You are building agents, autonomous research pipelines, or trading systems that need more than a packaged strategy product — calibrated Brier scores you can independently verify, causal-tree thesis modelling with auto-evaluation cycles, regime classification across the full 48K-contract universe, computed indicators (implied yield, cliff risk, liquidity availability score, event overround), and a 56-tool MCP server that drops into Claude Code or Cursor in one line.
Choose Astron if
Astron's Raven 1.0 is purpose-built for traders who want a packaged sentiment-driven strategy product with tokenized execution across sports betting and prediction market platforms — without building infrastructure themselves. That packaged product focus, including dedicated sports betting coverage, is Astron's core specialisation.
Both are AI-agent PM products. Astron packages tokenized sentiment-driven execution; SimpleFunctions ships the infrastructure layer — world model, thesis system, calibrated indicators, MCP tools.
At a glance
Three things that
actually differ.
Everything Astron gives you — sentiment-driven automated execution and prediction market coverage — SimpleFunctions also gives you, on Kalshi and Polymarket with an autonomous Portfolio Autopilot.
On top of that, SF ships a causal-tree thesis system, live Brier scores at /api/calibration, 56 MCP tools, and computed indicators across 48K+ contracts — none of which Astron publishes.
SF publishes its own Brier scores: Kalshi 0.20, Polymarket 0.12 on T-24h price, past 90 days. Astron claims up to 98% accuracy for Raven 1.0 but does not publish an equivalent audit trail.
Side by side
10 dimensions · verified 2026-04SimpleFunctionsKalshi + Polymarket normalised across 48K+ active contracts, with matched cross-venue pairs surfaced at /api/public/cross-venue/pairs.
AstronCovers prediction market platforms and sports betting venues; exact venue list not published.
SimpleFunctionsGET /api/public/market/{ticker}?depth=true returns bid/ask ladder, spread, and slippage estimates per contract.
AstronNot published as a standalone data endpoint.
SimpleFunctionsImplied yield, cliff risk index, liquidity availability score, event overround, τ-days, and regime label pre-computed across 48K+ contracts at /screen.
AstronNot published; Raven 1.0 focuses on sentiment signals and execution rather than pre-computed contract metrics.
SimpleFunctionsLive Brier scores at /api/calibration — by venue, category, price bucket; Kalshi 0.20, Polymarket 0.12 on T-24h price, past 90 days.
AstronRaven 1.0 claims up to 98% short-term forecasting accuracy; no Brier score breakdown or methodology is published.
SimpleFunctionsPOST /api/thesis/create decomposes any claim into a testable causal tree, scans Kalshi and Polymarket for tradeable edges, and runs a continuous news-scan evaluation heartbeat.
AstronNot published.
SimpleFunctionsPortfolio Autopilot — 1M-context LLM, 13 data sources, 7-gate risk cascade — executes on Kalshi and Polymarket within user-defined risk parameters.
AstronRaven 1.0 provides automated execution via tokenized strategy products across sports betting and prediction market platforms.
SimpleFunctionsNews scan integrated into the thesis evaluation heartbeat; not a standalone sentiment product.
AstronSentiment analysis is a core Raven 1.0 feature and a primary driver of its automated execution signals.
SimpleFunctions56 tools via claude mcp add simplefunctions --url https://simplefunctions.dev/api/mcp/mcp — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client.
AstronNo MCP server published.
SimpleFunctionsNot offered; SF exposes raw execution through Portfolio Autopilot and the public API.
AstronTokenized strategy products are a featured Raven 1.0 capability for automated deployment.
SimpleFunctionsPublic REST + MCP + CLI reads require no auth; authenticated thesis/intent execution is free up to 15M tokens, then pay-per-token.
AstronPricing not published publicly on Astron's website.
Methodology
Verified 2026-04 from public sources only — Astron's documentation, public website, and publicly observable behaviour. We never claim non-public information about Astron's internals. SimpleFunctions claims on this page are computed live from /api/calibration, /api/public/cross-venue/pairs, and /api/public/markets — you can re-verify them yourself with curl.
Use cases
Same data, different
best fit per scenario.
Scenario 01
Building an AI agent that decomposes a political or economic thesis into tradeable sub-claims and executes autonomously.
SimpleFunctions · best fit
SF's causal thesis system handles the full pipeline: POST /api/thesis/create decomposes the claim, maps sub-claims to live Kalshi and Polymarket contracts, propagates probabilities through the causal tree, and runs a continuous evaluation heartbeat. Portfolio Autopilot can then execute within a 7-gate risk cascade — no manual order entry required.
Astron
Astron's Raven 1.0 offers automated execution via tokenized strategies, but does not publish a structured thesis decomposition or causal-tree API that would support this workflow.
Scenario 02
Running a pre-packaged sentiment-driven strategy on sports betting markets without building any infrastructure.
SimpleFunctions
SF does not cover sports betting markets and does not offer pre-packaged tokenized strategy products; its autonomous execution targets Kalshi and Polymarket contracts only.
Astron · best fit
This is Astron's core product. Raven 1.0's sentiment analysis and tokenized strategy layer are purpose-built for traders who want automated sports betting and prediction market exposure without writing infrastructure code — Astron wins here.
Scenario 03
Auditing the accuracy of a prediction market data provider before relying on its signals in a production pipeline.
SimpleFunctions · best fit
GET /api/calibration returns SF's live Brier scores broken down by venue, category, and price bucket — Kalshi 0.20, Polymarket 0.12 on T-24h price, past 90 days. You can re-run the query with curl at any time and verify the numbers independently.
Astron
Astron publishes an accuracy claim of up to 98% short-term forecasting accuracy for Raven 1.0 but does not publish a Brier score breakdown, time window, or methodology document against which the claim can be independently verified.
Scenario 04
Connecting prediction market data and execution to Claude Code or Cursor via a native MCP integration.
SimpleFunctions · best fit
claude mcp add simplefunctions --url https://simplefunctions.dev/api/mcp/mcp installs 56 tools in one command, covering market queries, thesis creation, signal injection, and trade ideas — all accessible in natural language from any MCP-compatible client.
Astron
Astron does not publish an MCP server; there is no documented integration path for Claude Code, Cursor, or other MCP clients.
Live data
The SimpleFunctions claims on this page are not marketing copy. Brier scores, market counts, and cross-venue pair counts are computed live from /calibration, /screen, and /api/public/cross-venue/pairs. All public, all free, all CC-BY-4.0.
FAQ
What is Astron Raven 1.0?+
Based on Astron's public website, Raven 1.0 is Astron's flagship AI agent product for prediction markets. It claims up to 98% short-term forecasting accuracy and offers features including sentiment analysis, tokenized automated strategies, and execution across sports betting and prediction market platforms. Astron's focus is on delivering a packaged product for traders rather than an open API layer or MCP integration for custom agent development.
How does SimpleFunctions' causal thesis system work?+
POST /api/thesis/create takes a plain-language claim — for example, 'The Fed will cut rates before November' — and decomposes it into a causal tree of testable sub-claims. SF then scans Kalshi and Polymarket for contracts that map to each node, propagates probabilities through the tree, and runs a continuous evaluation heartbeat: news scan → price refresh → milestone check → LLM evaluation → confidence update. You can inject external signals via POST /api/thesis/{id}/signal. Public theses are forkable. No competitor publishes a comparable structured decomposition system.
Does SimpleFunctions have automated execution like Astron?+
Yes. Portfolio Autopilot uses a 1M-context LLM that reads 13 data sources and passes a 7-gate risk cascade — kill switch, position limits, drawdown gate, regime check, and others — before placing any order on Kalshi or Polymarket. Unlike Astron's tokenized strategy products, SF's Autopilot is a general-purpose autonomous agent that operates on the contracts identified by your thesis, within risk parameters you define per session.
How can I verify SimpleFunctions' forecasting accuracy?+
GET /api/calibration returns SF's live Brier scores, broken down by venue, category, and price bucket. Current figures: Kalshi 0.20, Polymarket 0.12 on T-24h price, past 90 days. You can re-run this with a plain curl request at any time. Astron claims up to 98% short-term accuracy for Raven 1.0 but does not publish a Brier score breakdown, a defined time window, or a methodology document against which the claim can be checked.
Does Astron have an MCP server?+
Based on publicly observable information as of 2026-04, Astron does not publish an MCP server. SimpleFunctions ships a 56-tool MCP server that installs with a single command: claude mcp add simplefunctions --url https://simplefunctions.dev/api/mcp/mcp. It works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible client, giving agents access to market queries, thesis creation, signal injection, cross-venue pair matching, and trade ideas without writing any integration code.
Which product is better for sports betting?+
Astron explicitly covers sports betting markets and its sentiment analysis layer targets that vertical. SimpleFunctions covers Kalshi and Polymarket; it does not currently offer sports betting data or execution. If sports betting coverage is a hard requirement for your use case, Astron is the stronger fit. SF is focused on regulated prediction market venues.
What is the difference between Astron's tokenized strategies and SF's Portfolio Autopilot?+
Astron's tokenized strategies are packaged, pre-defined products that traders deploy through Raven 1.0. SF's Portfolio Autopilot is a general autonomous agent — it reads 13 live data sources, runs a causal thesis evaluation cycle, applies a 7-gate risk cascade, and places orders based on your defined thesis and risk parameters. The distinction is product versus programmable agent framework: Astron's model is closer to a fund-in-a-box; SF's is closer to an infrastructure layer you configure and extend.
Can I use SimpleFunctions without writing any code?+
Yes. The /screen page surfaces computed indicators across 48K+ contracts; trade ideas with conviction and catalyst appear at /api/public/ideas; and the 56-tool MCP server lets Claude or Cursor operate the full system in natural language. Portfolio Autopilot can execute trades autonomously within the risk parameters you set, requiring no manual order entry. For researchers who prefer code, the full REST API and CLI (npm i -g @spfunctions/cli) expose every capability programmatically.
Start for free.
Public endpoints are free for normal usage and rate-limited for reliability. Authenticated endpoints are free up to 15M tokens, then pay per token. No credit card to start.