Why It Is a Sequence, Not a Sum
The first instinct on combining four indicators is to weight them and produce a single score. That fails for prediction markets in a way worth understanding.
The four indicators measure different things that interact non-linearly. A contract with very high IY and very low CRI is not "average expected edge" — it is a stale pricing that nobody is contesting, which is an entirely different trade than a contract with average IY and average CRI. Averaging the two destroys the information that distinguished them.
The composition rule is therefore gates in sequence, not weights in a sum. Each gate is binary — either the contract passes the threshold or it does not — and only the contracts that pass all four are surfaced as "expected edge candidates." The order of the gates also matters, because some gates are cheaper to evaluate than others:
1. τ-days gate — cheap, eliminates the pinned and the too-far-out
2. IY gate — cheap, eliminates the boring
3. CRI gate — moderate, eliminates the sleepy
4. EE gate — moderate, eliminates the families with no liquidity
A contract that fails the first gate is dropped before any of the later gates compute. This is not a performance optimization in the traditional sense — it is the correct hierarchy, because a τ-pinned contract cannot have meaningful IY no matter what the formula says.
What "Edge" Even Means Here
The word "edge" is doing two jobs in prediction-market trading. Sometimes it means the displayed bid-ask difference between what you can buy and sell at — that is the executable edge. Sometimes it means the difference between your subjective probability and the market's implied probability — that is the thesis edge. Expected Edge in this glossary is neither of those; it is the composite filter that turns the universe into a list of contracts where the math says trading is worth investigating.
Expected Edge does not say "this contract will make you money." It says "this contract is one of the survivors of all four indicator gates, which means it passed the cheapest possible filter for being interesting, and you should now spend stage 2 and stage 3 of the valuation funnel on it." It is a stage 1 output, not a final answer.
The Hierarchy Is Not Optional
The most common mistake in expected-edge composition is collapsing the hierarchy: scoring a contract on a weighted average of IY, CRI, EE, and τ, and trading the top 10. This produces a list that is dominated by the indicator with the largest natural variance (usually CRI), and it lets bad scores on one indicator be compensated by good scores on another.
The point of the hierarchy is exactly to prevent that compensation. A contract that is illiquid (LAS = 0) is not a tradable contract no matter how high its IY is. A contract that is pinned (τ → 0) is not a tradable contract no matter how high its CRI is. The gates are independent veto powers. None of them get to be averaged away.