Research NoteDESK/ELECTIONS_DESK

Elections Desk Research Note: Macro-Political Turbulence and Asymmetric Opportunities

Analysis of high-volume Kalshi markets reveals intense focus on Trump administration stability and policy appointments, with significant alpha potential in mispriced Fed and recession narratives. The high implied volatility in political markets contrasts with calm macroeconomic sentiment, creating actionable dislocations.

SimpleFunctions Research
SF/RESEARCH

Key Takeaways

  • The 50% probability of 'Trump Out' in 2025 represents peak political panic and offers a favorable short opportunity given high constitutional removal barriers.
  • The Kevin Hassett Fed Chair market (38%) is critically linked to the Trump outcome; its conditional probability implies a >60% chance if Trump stays, pricing a significant monetary policy shift.
  • Macro markets at ~1% for recession show extreme complacency and provide cheap tail-risk hedging against both economic slowdown and political crisis fallout.
  • The optimal trading strategy involves selling expensive political volatility while buying undervalued policy and macroeconomic volatility through structured pairs and hedge positions.

Executive Summary: A Market Bifurcated Between Politics and Policy

The current prediction market landscape, as captured in high-volume Kalshi markets, presents a stark dichotomy. On one side, political markets—specifically those concerning the stability of the Trump administration—are pricing in significant turbulence, with a 50% probability of President Trump leaving office before year-end. On the other, macroeconomic and financial asset markets reflect a remarkably sanguine outlook, with sub-10% probabilities for recession, aggressive Fed easing, or parabolic crypto moves. This disconnect creates the core trading thesis: markets may be significantly overestimating near-term political volatility while underestimating the economic and policy consequences of a stable, second-term Trump administration. The appointment market for Fed Chair Kevin Hassett (38% probability) stands as a critical nexus between these two narratives.

Deep Dive: The 'Trump Out' Market – Anatomy of a 50% Probability

The market 'Donald Trump out this year?' trading at 50.0% with a massive $9.8M in volume is the dominant signal in the current landscape. This implies a coin-flip chance of a presidential departure via resignation, removal, or death before January 1, 2026.

  • Historical Context & Implied Volatility: This level is unprecedented for a sitting president in the modern prediction market era. For comparison, similar markets for Presidents Biden or Obama never sustained probabilities above low single digits barring acute health crises. The 50% price indicates markets perceive an extraordinary spectrum of risk pathways.
  • Deconstructing the Catalyst Map: The probability likely aggregates several non-mutually exclusive risks:
    1. 25th Amendment/Health: Given Trump's age (78) and the intense stress of office, this is a constant baseline risk.
    2. Resignation: Seen as unlikely given personal disposition, but not impossible under extreme pressure.
    3. Impeachment & Removal: A Democratic-controlled House could initiate proceedings, but a conviction in a likely Republican-held Senate remains a very high bar. The market may be pricing in a small but non-zero chance of a black-swan political crisis that fractures the GOP senate caucus.
  • Trading Insight & Asymmetry: The 50% price appears rich. While political warfare will be intense, the constitutional mechanisms for removal are intentionally steep. A short position (NO shares) offers a favorable risk/reward profile. The most plausible path to a 'Yes' resolution is a health event, which is inherently unpredictable but statistically still below a 50% annualized risk for a 78-year-old male. Any stabilization in the political narrative or failed impeachment moves should see this probability decay rapidly toward 20-30%, representing significant downside for 'Yes' shares.

The Policy Corollary: Fed Chair Hassett and the Shadow of MAGA Monetary Policy

The market 'Will Trump next nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair?' at 38.0% ($5.0M volume) is the most significant policy market and is intrinsically linked to the 'Trump Out' narrative. Kevin Hassett, former Trump CEA chair and a respected but traditionally mainstream Republican economist, has been a speculated candidate.

  • Analysis of the Probability: A 38% probability suggests Hassett is considered a front-runner, but not a certainty. Jerome Powell's term expires in May 2026. The market 'Powell leaves before 2026?' is priced at just 1.0%, indicating high confidence Powell serves his full term. Therefore, the Hassett market is pricing in a future nomination by Trump, presumably in 2026.
  • The Political-Policy Link: If the 'Trump Out' market resolves to 'Yes', the Hassett nomination becomes moot. Consequently, the true implied probability of a Hassett nomination, conditional on Trump remaining in office, is significantly higher than 38%. A rough calculation (ignoring other potential nominators) suggests it could be north of 60% (38% / (100% - 50%)). This reveals the market is pricing a Hassett nomination as a likely outcome of a continued Trump presidency.
  • Market Implications: A Hassett-led Fed would be perceived as more accommodative and potentially more susceptible to political pressure than a Powell-led one. This is a structural bullish catalyst for equities and a bearish catalyst for long-term Treasury bonds (higher inflation risk premium). The mispricing link between the two Trump markets creates a pairs trade opportunity: go long Hassett nomination / short Trump out.

Macroeconomic Calm: A Contrarian Signal Amidst Political Storm?

In stark contrast to the political frenzy, macroeconomic markets are priced for a 'soft landing' perfection.

  • Recession in 2025 (1.0%): At just 1%, this market is assigning a nearly negligible chance of a standard two-quarter recession. This is historically low for any forward year, ignoring the current political uncertainty and the lagged effects of prior tightening. This represents a major complacency signal.
  • Fed Cuts (2 cuts = 6.0%): The market for exactly two 25bp cuts (50bps total) in 2025 is at only 6%. This, combined with the recession probability, suggests markets expect the Fed to be on hold, gently easing, with no dramatic stimulus need. This is inconsistent with either a major political crisis ('Trump Out') or a Trump administration likely pushing for lower rates.
  • Trading Insight: The macroeconomic suite offers asymmetric short opportunities (buying 'Yes' on recession, buying 'Yes' on more cuts). The triggering catalyst could be either an economic slowdown OR a political crisis that shocks confidence. The low cost of these contracts (high implied odds against) provides a valuable hedge against the turbulent political narrative and a pure contrarian macro bet.

Crypto and Sports: Side Shows Reflecting Risk Sentiment

  • Cryptocurrency Majors: Both Bitcoin ($130K+ at 1.0%, $150K+ at 1.0%) and Ethereum ($5K+ at 2.0%) markets assign minuscule chances to parabolic 2025 rallies. This aligns with the calm macro outlook but may underestimate endogenous crypto cycles. These are lottery-ticket contracts with high negative carry (steady probability decay).
  • 2026 NFL Championship: The Philadelphia Eagles (10%) and Los Angeles Rams (14%) represent early high-tier favorites. These volumes ($5.6M, $4.2M) highlight the significant liquidity in non-political markets. For context, a 14% probability in a 32-team league (implied 3.125% neutral) represents being a 4-to-1 favorite. These are efficient, sentiment-driven sports betting markets with less clear structural edges.

Integrated Trading Thesis & Catalyst Calendar

Primary Thesis: The Great Disconnect. Markets are simultaneously pricing high political volatility and low economic/policy volatility. These states are contradictory. One narrative will converge toward the other.

Recommended Actionable Views:

  1. Core Positioning: Short Political Volatility, Long Policy Volatility.
    • Trade: Sell 'Trump Out YES' (current 50%). Hedge with small long position in 'Recession YES' (1%) as a tail-risk catch-all.
    • Rationale: The constitutional threshold for removal is higher than current sentiment suggests. Political noise will remain high, but the binary outcome is likely 'NO'.
  2. Pairs Trade: The Trump-Hassett Linkage.
    • Trade: Long 'Hassett Fed Chair YES' (38%), dynamically hedged against 'Trump Out YES'.
    • Rationale: The conditional probability is compelling. A stable Trump administration makes a Powell reappointment (seen as insufficiently dovish by Trump) unlikely, elevating Hassett's chances.
  3. Contrarian Macro Hedge: The Complacency Trade.
    • Trade: Allocate small capital to long-dated, out-of-the-money macro contracts: 'Recession 2025 YES' (1%) and 'Fed Cuts >2 YES'.
    • Rationale: Extremely cheap insurance against any economic stumble or a crisis-induced Fed reaction.

Key Catalysts (Q2-Q4 2025):

  • Political: House impeachment inquiries (if initiated), Senate trial votes, Supreme Court rulings on immunity/obstruction cases, election-related litigation.
  • Policy: Fed commentary reacting to political instability, White House statements on Powell/Hassett, Congressional hearings on Fed independence.
  • Economic: Any sharp deterioration in consumer confidence or business investment linked to political uncertainty, Q2/Q3 2025 GDP prints.

Risk Factors

  • Black Swan Health Event: The unpredicted health catalyst is the primary risk to short 'Trump Out' positions.
  • Unprecedented Political Escalation: While considered low probability, a crime-fraud type revelation that instantly converts GOP Senate votes cannot be fully discounted.
  • Market Inefficiency: These markets are driven by sentiment and liquidity; probabilities can diverge from fundamentals for extended periods.
  • Conditional Dependency: The Hassett trade is entirely conditional on Trump's survival and re-nomination intent, creating binary correlation risk.

Conclusion

The prediction markets are screaming a story of two realities. The actionable intelligence lies in the disconnect. The extreme 50% probability of a presidential exit feels more like a reflection of acute anxiety than a冷静 assessment of constitutional stability. Meanwhile, macroeconomic optimism appears overextended. The strategic opportunity is to position for a re-convergence: political stability proving more resilient than expected, while the economic and policy consequences of that same stability—embodied in a potential shift to a more dovish, politically-aligned Fed Chair—are currently underpriced. The Hassett market at 38% is the keystone, offering a direct conduit to bet on the policy implications of a sustained Trump presidency.

Market Analysis

Donald Trump out this year? 📉

Current Probability: 50.0%

Overpriced relative to historical and constitutional precedent. Primary risk is health, not politics. Expect mean reversion toward 20-30% range barring a major, immediate crisis.

Trump nominates Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair 📈

Current Probability: 38.0%

Undervalued on a conditional basis. The key policy derivative of a stable Trump administration. Represents a pivot toward a more politicized, dovish Fed.

Recession in 2025 📈

Current Probability: 1.0%

Extreme complacency. Serves as a cheap hedge and contrarian macro bet. Catalyst could be economic or political.