Research NoteDESK/MACRO_&_RATES_DESK

Macro & Rates Desk: Weekly Intelligence Brief

Markets price high political volatility but low macro risk; crypto ranges diverge from central bank stability expectations.

SimpleFunctions Research
SF/RESEARCH

Key Takeaways

  • Political volatility is priced at crisis levels (50% Trump exit), while macro stability is priced as a near-certainty (1% recession).
  • The 38% odds of a Hassett Fed Chair nomination conflict with the 1% odds of Powell leaving, presenting a potential arbitrage.
  • Bitcoin markets show a 20% chance of a drop below $80k, a significant downside risk premium versus minimal extreme upside bets.
  • The 1% recession probability is a historically low reading that offers an asymmetric, high-payoff hedge against economic downturn.
  • Key catalysts are the election, FOMC decisions, and GDP prints, any of which could violently reprice these divergent narratives.

Executive Summary: A Market of Paradoxes

The current prediction market landscape presents a striking dichotomy. Political markets, particularly surrounding the Trump presidency, exhibit extreme volatility and uncertainty, with a 50% implied probability of an early exit before 2026. In stark contrast, traditional macro stability indicators—Fed leadership, recession risk, and rate cuts—are priced with remarkable complacency, with probabilities in the low single digits. This divergence suggests markets are grappling with two parallel narratives: one of high-stakes political disruption and another of entrenched economic and institutional stability. The crypto complex occupies a middle ground, with markets assigning non-trivial odds to significant downside moves in Bitcoin, indicating a nuanced view of risk assets. For traders, the tension between these narratives creates both hedging opportunities and potential for violent repricing should one narrative overtake the other.

Core Narrative: Political Instability vs. Macro Steadiness

The defining feature of this dataset is the elevated 50% probability on Donald Trump out this year?. This is an extraordinarily high implied odds for a sitting U.S. president to leave office within a year, far exceeding any modern historical precedent outside of electoral defeat. It reflects a market pricing in a non-zero and significant chance of resignation, incapacitation, or removal via constitutional mechanisms. This political risk premium permeates related markets, notably the 38% probability on Will Trump next nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair?. This market is contingent on a Trump nomination occurring before January 2029, but current trading likely reflects expectations of an imminent or near-term Fed Chair vacancy, potentially linked to Powell's departure (priced at just 1%) or a post-election reshuffle.

Juxtaposed against this is a remarkably calm macro outlook. The Will there be a recession in 2025? market sits at a mere 1% probability, indicating near-total confidence in a continued economic expansion. Similarly, the Will the Fed cut rates 2 times? market (2 cuts of 50 bps total) is priced at just 6%, signaling expectations for a shallow, cautious, or paused easing cycle. The near-certainty of Jerome Powell's tenure continuing (Powell leaves before 2026? at 1%) completes a picture of expected central bank continuity and policy predictability. This creates a fundamental tension: how can political upheaval of the magnitude implied by the Trump exit market coexist with such unshakable macro and institutional stability? One narrative must be wrong.

Deep Dive: Federal Reserve Leadership in Focus

The interplay between the Powell and Hassett markets is particularly instructive. The 1% probability on Powell's early departure suggests markets view his position as virtually unassailable in the near term, despite political pressure. This aligns with historical norms of Fed chair independence. However, the 38% probability on a Kevin Hassett nomination is a striking outlier. Hassett, a former Trump economic advisor and Council of Economic Advisers chair, is a plausible candidate for a future Republican administration. Yet, a 38% likelihood suggests traders see a significant chance of this occurring outside the normal appointment cycle, or are heavily front-running a potential Trump election victory and subsequent nomination in 2026.

Actionable Insight: This spread represents a potential arbitrage. The low probability on Powell exiting contradicts the high probability on a Hassett nomination by Trump, unless the nomination is expected far in the future (post-2026). Traders could construct a pair trade: go long Powell leaves before 2026? (buying at 1%) and short Will Trump next nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair? (selling at 38%), betting on a convergence where the Hassett probability falls unless a near-term Fed vacancy emerges. Key catalysts include any public statements from Trump or allies on Fed chair preferences, or any health/retirement rumors concerning Powell.

Cryptocurrency Markets: Asymmetric Risk Perceptions

The Bitcoin markets reveal a cautious, range-bound outlook for 2024. The low probabilities for extreme upside ($130k+ at 1%, $150k+ at 1%) suggest the euphoric momentum-driven rallies of past cycles are not expected to repeat imminently. More telling is the How low will Bitcoin get this year? market for $80,000.01 or above, which carries a 20% probability. This implies a one-in-five chance Bitcoin falls from current levels (~$93,000 as of this analysis) below $80k. This is a non-trivial downside risk premium.

The structure suggests a market view of Bitcoin as a mature, yet volatile, asset facing macro headwinds (potentially higher-for-longer rates) and regulatory uncertainty, capping explosive upside while acknowledging significant downside volatility. Ethereum's $5,000+ target is priced at 2%, slightly higher than Bitcoin's extreme upsides, perhaps reflecting optimism around ETF approvals or ecosystem development, but still a low-conviction bet.

Actionable Insight: The skew towards priced downside risk (20%) versus priced extreme upside (1%) presents an opportunity for structured options-like strategies in prediction markets. Traders with a neutral-to-bullish view might find value selling the downside panic (the 20% probability seems high if macro stability holds) while using small premiums to buy lottery tickets on the extreme upside calls.

Macro & Recession Outlook: Complacency or Confidence?

The 1% recession probability for 2025 is a powerful statement. Historically, such low implied odds are rare and often occur at cyclical peaks before a downturn. This pricing discounts a wide range of risks: lingering inflation, elevated debt servicing costs, geopolitical shocks, and the potential for the political volatility priced elsewhere to spill into the real economy.

Coupled with the minimal expectation for aggressive Fed easing (6% for two cuts), the market narrative is one of a 'soft landing' so secure it is almost impervious to shock. The Will the Fed cut rates 2 times? market is critical here. With the first cut still pending, pricing only a 6% chance of achieving two 25-bp cuts (or one 50-bp cut) in 2024 suggests a belief that the Fed will move slowly, data dependency will limit forward guidance, or that cuts may even be paused after an initial insurance move.

Key Risk Factor: This represents extreme macro complacency. Any shift in leading indicators (jobless claims, ISM surveys, consumer sentiment) or a credit event could trigger a violent repricing in recession probabilities, which have asymmetric upside from 1%. This market is a cheap hedge for broader portfolio risk.

Peripheral Market: Sports as a Liquidity Signal

The Philadelphia Eagles to win 2026 Pro Football Championship at 10% is notable for its high volume ($5.6M). This indicates robust liquidity in non-correlated event markets on Kalshi. For macro traders, this is a useful gauge of platform liquidity and risk appetite. The 10% probability is likely near the top tier of NFL team odds, reflecting the Eagles' perceived strong roster and management. It serves as a reminder that capital is actively seeking out diverse risk-taking opportunities beyond finance and politics.

Catalysts & Calendar: Events That Could Reprice Markets

  1. Political Catalysts (High Impact): Any legal developments in pending cases against Donald Trump; the Republican and Democratic National Conventions (July 2024); the Presidential Election (Nov 5, 2024); Inauguration Day (Jan 20, 2025). A Trump victory would likely spike the Hassett Fed Chair probability while potentially lowering the immediate Trump out this year probability.
  2. Monetary Policy Catalysts (Medium Impact): FOMC meetings, especially any shift in the 'dot plot'; CPI and jobs reports that alter the cut trajectory; any testimony from Powell hinting at future plans. Hawkish shifts could increase the Powell leaves? probability (via political pressure) and crush the 2 cuts market.
  3. Crypto Catalysts (Medium Impact): Ethereum ETF launch and flows; regulatory announcements from the SEC or CFTC; major on-chain events (e.g., Bitcoin halving aftermath).
  4. Macro Data Catalysts (Slow Burn): Q3/Q4 2024 GDP reports; any consecutive negative quarter would instantly resolve the recession in 2025 market to 'Yes' from a 1% probability, creating a massive payout.

Trading Strategies & Conclusions

Recommended Stances:

  1. Hedge Political Tail Risk: The 50% Trump out probability is too high relative to historical base rates but reflects real uncertainty. For portfolio managers, a small long position in this market acts as a non-correlated hedge against unprecedented political shock.
  2. Fade Macro Complacency: Establish a long position in recession in 2025 (currently 1%). Even a move to 10% offers a 10x return. The asymmetry is compelling, and the cost of carry is minimal.
  3. Arbitrage the Fed Narrative: Execute the pair trade between Powell exit and Hassett nomination as described earlier, betting on logical consistency returning to these linked contracts.
  4. Trade Crypto Ranges: Given the asymmetric pricing, consider selling the Bitcoin below $80k probability (i.e., bet 'No' at 20% implied odds) if you have a strong view on macro stability and ETF inflows providing a floor.

Conclusion: Prediction markets are signaling a bifurcated world. They are screaming about political uncertainty but whispering about economic and monetary policy stability. This disconnect cannot persist indefinitely. Either political risks will subside, causing a repricing downward in the Trump exit and Hassett markets, or the political volatility will begin to infect the macro narrative, causing recession and Fed policy probabilities to rise from their rock-bottom levels. The trading opportunity lies in anticipating which of these two narratives—political turmoil or macro steadfastness—will ultimately dominate the 2024-2025 period. The current pricing offers explicit odds on both outcomes, allowing for strategic positioning across the dichotomy.

Market Analysis

Donald Trump out this year? 📈

Current Probability: 50.0%

Extreme implied volatility. Priced for a binary, high-impact event. Suggests market perceives significant risk of resignation, removal, or incapacitation. Far exceeds historical base rates for a sitting president.

Will there be a recession in 2025? 📈

Current Probability: 1.0%

Pricing extreme complacency. Asymmetric payoff profile is highly attractive for a hedge. Any negative GDP print would cause a massive, instantaneous repricing.

Will Trump next nominate Kevin Hassett as Fed Chair? 📉

Current Probability: 38.0%

High probability contingent on Trump being in a position to nominate. Logical inconsistency with Powell exit market. Vulnerable to decline without a near-term Fed vacancy catalyst.

How low will Bitcoin get this year? ($80k+) 📉

Current Probability: 20.0%

Significant downside risk premium. Suggests traders see substantive macro/technical barriers to maintaining current prices. A key gauge of crypto risk appetite.

Will the Fed cut rates 2 times? 📉

Current Probability: 6.0%

Market expects a shallow, hesitant, or paused cutting cycle. Aligns with 'higher for longer' narrative and resilient economic data. Sensitive to inflation prints.