Research NoteDESK/ELECTIONS_DESK

Research Note: Election & Policy Volatility, Crypto Momentum, and Monetary Policy Anchoring

Analysis of Kalshi's high-volume markets reveals a dominant narrative of political uncertainty driving election bets, alongside a constructive but skeptical crypto outlook and near-unanimous expectations for aggressive Fed easing.

SimpleFunctions Research
SF/RESEARCH

Key Takeaways

  • Political risk is priced at maximum uncertainty (50%), representing the dominant market narrative and source of potential volatility.
  • Fed policy expectations are anchored to an aggressive 75 bps of easing (98% probability), creating asymmetric hawkish risk.
  • Bitcoin's implied 2025 range is between $80K support and $100K resistance, with parabolic moves above $130K seen as improbable (<2%).
  • Markets perceive Fed Chair Powell's position as secure (1% exit probability), isolating monetary policy from political turbulence.
  • High trading volumes in both political and crypto markets indicate deep liquidity and hedging demand across these speculative asset classes.

Executive Summary

Our analysis of the ten highest-volume prediction markets on Kalshi reveals three dominant, interwoven narratives. First, political uncertainty is the single most powerful market driver, with the ā€˜Trump out this year?’ contract attracting $9.7M in volume at a pivotal 50% probability, indicating a market in extreme distress and pricing in profound, binary risk. Second, cryptocurrency markets exhibit bullish momentum but tempered terminal price expectations for 2025, with significant volume chasing both high ($130K+, $140K+) and low ($80K+) Bitcoin targets. Third, monetary policy expectations are overwhelmingly anchored to an aggressive easing cycle, with a 98% probability assigned to three Fed rate cuts (75 bps) in 2025. The convergence of these themes suggests a trading landscape where political catalysts could override economic fundamentals, creating volatility spillover across asset classes.

Deep Dive: The Political Binary – ā€˜Trump out this year?’

<strong>Current State & Significance:</strong> Trading at a probability of exactly 50.0% with a leading $9.7M in volume, this market is the center of gravity for political risk. A 50% probability is not a forecast of an event’s likelihood in a vacuum; it represents a market in perfect equilibrium between two radically different future states, implying extreme uncertainty and the highest possible option volatility. This binary outcome—whether President Trump serves his full term through January 2026—carries existential implications for fiscal policy, regulation, and geopolitical stance.

<strong>Historical & Structural Context:</strong> Historically, ā€˜leader departure’ markets in the first year of a term are exceedingly rare in established democracies. The 50% price is fundamentally disconnected from historical base rates and reflects a unique confluence of factors: the President's age, the intense political polarization documented since the 2020 election, and the unresolved legal challenges that were temporarily paused upon inauguration but could theoretically resurface. The market is likely pricing a basket of risk factors: health issues, resignation under pressure, or a constitutional crisis triggered by external events.

<strong>Actionable Insights & Trading Implications:</strong> • <em>Volatility Play:</em> The 50% pin represents maximum entropy. Any catalyst (e.g., a major health bulletin, a seismic political development) will cause a dramatic probability repricing. Traders should monitor this contract as a leading indicator for broad political risk sentiment. • <em>Hedging Strategy:</em> For institutional portfolios, a long position in this ā€˜Yes’ contract could serve as a non-correlated hedge against a ā€˜regime change’ shock that would negatively impact sectors like defense, traditional energy, or certain tax-sensitive industries. • <em>Arbitrage Note:</strong> The extreme focus on this single binary may create mispricing in related, more granular political markets (e.g., ā€˜Which party controls the Senate after 2026?’), which currently show lower implied volatility.

<strong>Key Catalysts & Risk Factors:</strong> Primary catalysts include official medical disclosures, major midterm election results that alter the impeachment math, or a significant escalation of geopolitical conflict. The key risk is market overreaction to rumor; the 50% level suggests the market is already in a perpetual state of alert.

Sector Analysis: Cryptocurrency Price Targets – Optimism with a Reality Check

Crypto markets command four of the top ten slots by volume, indicating robust trader interest. The data paints a picture of strong bullish conviction tempered by skepticism about near-term parabolic moves.

<strong>Bitcoin's Asymmetric Profile:</strong> • <em>High-Target Skepticism:</em> The ā€˜$130K or above’ (1% probability) and ā€˜$140K or above’ (2% probability) markets show minimal conviction for a near-double from current ~$85K levels within 2025. The ā€˜above $100K by year-end’ market at 13% probability is more informative; it assigns a low but non-trivial chance to a significant ~18%+ rally from here in the next eight months. • <em>Key Support Level:</em> The ā€˜$80,000.01 or above’ (i.e., Bitcoin stays above $80K) contract trades at a 38% probability. This is critical: the market believes there is a 62% chance Bitcoin falls below $80K at some point in 2025. This establishes $80K as a crucial support threshold in the collective psyche. • <em>Implied Trading Range:</em> Synthesizing these probabilities, the market’s modal expectation for 2025 is a volatile year with tests below $80K, but a failure to sustainably break above the $100K psychological barrier. The low probabilities for $130K+ suggest a view that a true macro-parabolic phase is a 2026+ story.

<strong>Ethereum's Lagging Narrative:</strong> The ā€˜$5,000 or above’ contract for ETH holds a 2% probability on $7.8M volume. This implies a more pessimistic outlook for ETH/BTC ratio appreciation, as $5K represents a smaller percentage gain from ~$4K than Bitcoin's high targets. This may reflect ongoing concerns about regulatory clarity for ETH as a security or relative ecosystem growth.

<strong>Actionable Insights:</strong> • The high volume on the ā€˜below $80K’ risk (inverse of the $80K+ contract) suggests demand for downside protection. Selling the ā€˜$80,000.01 or above’ contract (i.e., betting Bitcoin drops below $80K) at 38% may offer value. • The 13% probability for $100K+ provides a cheap, high-potential-payoff call option on a decisive breakout, suitable for risk-seeking capital. • <strong>Catalysts:</strong> Key drivers include the flow impact of spot Bitcoin ETFs, regulatory developments (particularly on ETH), and the broader risk asset environment which is itself tied to Fed policy.

Policy & Economics: The Fed's Prescribed Path and Powell's Perceived Stability

Monetary policy expectations are strikingly unified, presenting a stark contrast to political uncertainty.

<strong>The Easing Consensus:</strong> The ā€˜Will the Fed cut rates 3 times?’ contract trades at a 98% probability ($5.2M volume). The complementary ā€˜2 times’ contract languishes at 6%. This is a near-unanimous market verdict: 75 bps of easing in 2025 is effectively priced as a baseline. This aligns with the latest FOMC median projection but leaves the market vulnerable to any hawkish shift in incoming inflation or employment data.

<strong>Leadership Stability:</strong> The ā€˜Powell leaves before 2026?’ market at a 1% probability ($6.4M volume) is equally telling. The market assigns a near-zero chance of Powell’s early departure, viewing Fed leadership as an island of stability amidst political turmoil. This reinforces the view that the projected easing cycle is a function of economic data, not political pressure.

<strong>Trading Implications & Risks:</strong> • The 98% probability leaves almost no room for additional dovish pricing. The asymmetric risk is to the hawkish side. A hedge against ā€˜2 cuts or fewer’ (effectively the inverse of the 98% contract) could be a low-cost, high-impact position. • This strong Fed easing expectation is the foundational rationale behind the constructive, though range-bound, crypto outlook and general risk-asset support. Any deterioration in this view would have cross-asset negative consequences. • <strong>Catalysts:</strong> The primary data points are CPI and Non-Farm Payrolls reports. A string of two hot inflation prints could swiftly dismantle the 98% consensus, creating volatility.

Cross-Asset Correlations and Synthesis

The markets cannot be analyzed in isolation. Key interrelationships are evident:

  1. <strong>Politics Over Policy:</strong> The 50% Trump exit risk is a sword of Damocles over the orderly 98% Fed easing narrative. A political shock could disrupt economic conditions and force the Fed to alter its planned path, either by accelerating cuts (in a crisis) or pausing (if inflation is triggered by conflict).
  2. <strong>Crypto as a Political & Monetary Hedge:</strong> Bitcoin’s profile—seen as likely to stay above $80K (38% chance) but unlikely to hit $130K (1% chance)—positions it as a potential hedge against political turmoil and currency debasement from aggressive easing, but not yet as a ā€˜risk-on’ moonshot asset. Its correlation to macro policy is high.
  3. <strong>The Sports Outlier:</strong> The Philadelphia Eagles’ 10% championship probability (2026) is a pure, non-macro risk exposure, yet its high volume indicates deep liquidity pools on Kalshi looking for uncorrelated speculative outlets.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The prediction market landscape is dominated by the extreme binary risk of a political event, which overshadows a strong consensus on monetary easing and a cautiously optimistic crypto outlook.

<strong>Strategic Recommendations for Traders:</strong> • <strong>Monitor Political Volatility as an Asset Class:</strong> Use the ā€˜Trump out’ contract as a VIX-like gauge for systemic political risk. Establish positions in related, potentially mispriced political contracts. • <strong>Position for Fed Disappointment:</strong> The cost of insurance against fewer than three cuts (e.g., via the ā€˜2 times’ market or similar) is historically cheap given the 98% consensus. This represents a high-conviction, asymmetric trade. • <strong>Adopt a Range-Trading View on Bitcoin:</strong> Structure positions around the $80K-$100K corridor implied by probabilities. Fade extreme moves outside this range, as the markets currently assign low likelihood to both a crash and a parabola. • <strong>Maintain Cross-Asset Awareness:</strong> Recognize that a shock resolution in the political binary (a move from 50% toward either 10% or 90%) will reverberate through Fed expectations and crypto volatility. Portfolios should be stress-tested for this correlation break.

In summary, the markets are signaling a year where political narrative may trump economic data. Traders should prioritize managing tail risks emanating from Washington while navigating a pre-prescribed, but fragile, monetary policy path.

Market Analysis

Donald Trump out this year? šŸ“ˆ

Current Probability: 50.0%

The market's equilibrium at 50% reflects profound uncertainty and binary risk. It is pricing a basket of exit scenarios, not a single forecast. This is the primary volatility driver across all markets.

Will the Fed cut rates 3 times? šŸ“‰

Current Probability: 98.0%

Near-unanimous consensus leaves no room for dovish surprises. The contract is overbought; the only directional move is downward on hawkish data.

Will Bitcoin be above $100,000 by Dec 31, 2025? āž”ļø

Current Probability: 13.0%

Low probability suggests skepticism about a decisive breakout this year. However, it provides a cheap, high-payoff call option on a bullish macro or regulatory catalyst.

Research Note: Election & Policy Volatility, Crypto Momentum, and Monetary Policy Anchoring | SimpleFunctions Research