Research NoteDESK/ELECTIONS_DESK

Research Note: Geopolitical Shockwaves Through Policy & Crypto

An analysis of the 50% implied probability of a Trump exit in 2025, its potential drivers, and its profound interconnectedness with key monetary, crypto, and economic markets.

SimpleFunctions Research
SF/RESEARCH

Key Takeaways

  • The 50% probability of a Trump exit is the dominant market anomaly, driving re-pricing risk across assets.
  • Monetary policy and crypto markets are severely underpricing the tail risk emanating from the political stability market.
  • The 'Recession in 2025?' market at 1% is the most mispriced derivative of the Trump exit risk and offers a compelling hedge.
  • Trading strategies should focus on cross-market correlations and causality, not isolated binary outcomes.

Executive Summary

The central anomaly in current prediction market data is the Kalshi market, 'Donald Trump out this year?', trading at a 50.0% implied probability with a substantial $9.8M volume. This level, far elevated from conventional political risk models for a sitting president, suggests markets are pricing in a non-trivial chance of a significant, near-term political disruption. This note posits that this market is the primary node in a network of interconnected risks, directly influencing pricing in Federal Reserve leadership (Powell leaves?), monetary policy (Fed cuts 2 times?), macroeconomic stability (Recession in 2025?), and notably, cryptocurrency trajectories (Bitcoin/Ethereum highs and lows). The 50% probability is less a calibrated forecast and more a reflection of extreme binary uncertainty, creating asymmetric opportunity and substantial cross-market contagion risk. Traders must navigate this ecosystem not in silos but as an integrated web of political-economic causality.

Core Analysis: The Trump Exit Probability

A 50% probability for a sitting US president leaving office within a year is historically extraordinary. For context, similar markets for Presidents Biden or Trump in their first terms typically traded in the low single digits outside of acute crises. The $9.8M volume indicates deep, two-sided conviction, not mere speculative noise. This pricing likely synthesizes several non-mutually exclusive risk vectors:

  1. Health & Age: Both leading presidential candidates are elderly, introducing a baseline actuarial risk perceived to be higher than in prior administrations.
  2. Political & Legal Vulnerability: The potential for rapid-onset political crises (e.g., a constitutional confrontation, a destabilizing event) or an acceleration of ongoing legal challenges that could precipitate resignation or removal.
  3. Market as a Hedging Instrument: The market may be serving as a high-stakes hedge for portfolios exposed to 'Trump-risk' policies, inflating its probability as a risk-premium.

Actionable Insight: The 50% level represents a volatility premium. A long volatility strategy could involve buying both the 'Yes' and 'No' sides if the combined cost implies a probability significantly below 100% (an arbitrage opportunity if the market is inefficient). More likely, traders should view moves away from 50% as highly informative. A sustained break above 60% would signal a crystallization of a specific exit threat, while a drop below 40% suggests the market is normalizing the perceived risk. The binary nature makes it a poor standalone investment but a critical sentiment indicator for all other asset classes.

Interconnected Markets Analysis

The Trump exit probability is not an isolated variable. Its tentacles reach into monetary policy, crypto, and economic outlooks, as evidenced by the other high-volume markets.

Monetary Policy & Leadership (The Powell Nexus)

  • 'Powell leaves before 2026?' (1.0% Probability, $6.4M Volume): This market is currently pricing near-certainty of continuity. However, this is acutely sensitive to the Trump exit market. A Trump exit triggering a Harris administration could lead to immediate pressure on Fed leadership for a more dovish stance, potentially raising Powell's exit probability. Conversely, a Trump administration continuation might see renewed public pressure on Powell, though an outright forced resignation remains a tail risk. The 1% probability offers little upside; the key is to monitor for a correlated spike with the Trump market.
  • 'Will the Fed cut rates 2 times?' (6.0% Probability, $4.6M Volume): At only 6%, the market sees minimal chance of 50bps of cuts in 2025, aligning with a 'higher-for-longer' Fed narrative. A Trump exit shock could fundamentally alter this. A scenario involving political instability and market turmoil would force aggressive emergency cuts, making the 6% probability look vastly undervalued. Conversely, a stable policy continuation likely keeps this market suppressed. This market is a cheap, non-linear hedge against a political crisis scenario.

Cryptocurrency Markets (The Policy Uncertainty Channel)

Cryptocurrency markets show a distinct pattern: high volumes betting on extreme outcomes, suggesting they are a playground for hedging political and monetary regime change.

  • Bitcoin Targets: Markets for >$130K (1%), >$150K (1%), and >$100K by year-end (11%) show low probabilities but immense trading interest. The 'How low will Bitcoin get this year?' market ($80K.01 or above at 20%) is notably higher, indicating a perceived asymmetric skew to the downside in the base case.
  • The Trump Link: Crypto is now deeply politicized. A Trump exit could create initial risk-off volatility (pressuring BTC), but the subsequent policy uncertainty—particularly around regulatory frameworks, Treasury management, and the dollar—could catalyze a flight to crypto as a non-sovereign asset. The low probabilities on high-price targets would rapidly reprice upward in a 'regime change' scenario. The 11% probability for >$100K is the most sensitive near-term gauge.
  • Actionable Insight: Establish a pairs trade: go long the 'Bitcoin >$100K' market (11% probability) while shorting the broader equity volatility via other instruments, betting that a political shock will disproportionately benefit crypto over traditional assets. The $9.7M volume in these crypto markets indicates deep liquidity for such positioning.

Macroeconomic Stability

  • 'Will there be a recession in 2025?' (1.0% Probability, $4.4M Volume): The market is overwhelmingly optimistic, pricing a 99% chance of no recession. This is the market most vulnerable to a shock from the Trump exit probability. Any event dramatic enough to force a presidential exit would almost certainly trigger severe financial market distress and potentially a demand shock, making this 1% probability a severe mispricing of tail risk. This is the ultimate 'black swan' hedge in the current suite.

Catalysts & Risk Factors

Key Catalysts for Re-pricing:

  1. Health Disclosures or Events: Any medical incident involving either candidate will directly and immediately move the primary Trump exit market.
  2. Election Certification & Inauguration (Jan 6-20, 2025): Periods of constitutional transition are focal points for political instability, regardless of the winner.
  3. Supreme Court Rulings: Major rulings on presidential immunity or related cases could alter the legal threat landscape instantaneously.
  4. Market Stress Events: A sharp, unexplained equity or bond market sell-off could feed narratives of a 'crisis' requiring political change.
  5. Federal Reserve Communication: Any shift in the Fed's stance from data-dependent to crisis-concerned would link the Powell, rate cut, and recession markets.

Key Risk Factors:

  1. Market Illiquidity in Stress: While volumes are high now, a true crisis could cause spreads to widen dramatically, making exit difficult.
  2. Resolution Ambiguity: The precise definitions of 'leaves office' could be contested (e.g., temporary incapacitation vs. resignation), leading to disputed resolutions.
  3. Cross-Market Correlation Breakdown: In a true panic, historical correlations may break; crypto could sell off with stocks, negating hedge strategies.
  4. Media & Narrative Feedback Loops: Prediction market probabilities themselves have become news, potentially influencing the political realities they seek to predict.

Trading Strategy & Conclusions

The current market landscape is defined by a central political binary surrounded by derivatives that are mispricing its knock-on effects.

Recommended Strategic Postures:

  1. Relative Value Play: The 1% recession probability is anomalously low relative to the 50% Trump exit risk. A long position in the recession market, funded by a short position in a more stable, unrelated market (e.g., the Philadelphia Eagles Super Bowl future at 9%), captures this dislocation.
  2. Volatility Spread: Construct a basket that benefits from increased cross-asset volatility: long 'Trump Exit Yes,' long 'Fed Cuts 2 Times,' long 'Bitcoin >$100K.' Finance by selling stability in markets less linked to political risk (e.g., specific economic indicator markets).
  3. Catalyst Calendar Trade: Concentrate positions around known high-catalyst periods (inauguration week, Fed meeting days following poor economic data). The Trump exit market probability should be monitored for intra-day spikes during these times as a signal for entering other derivative positions.
  4. Avoid: Simple directional bets on the Trump exit market alone at 50% is a coin flip with a high cost of carry. Its primary value is as an indicator.

Conclusion: The Kalshi prediction markets are signaling a profound reassessment of US political stability for 2025, encapsulated in the 50% probability of a Trump exit. This is not an isolated bet but the keystone in an arch of financial and policy risk. The most significant opportunities lie not in this central binary itself, but in the markets that have yet to fully price its consequences—particularly the recession (1%) and aggressive Fed cut (6%) markets. Traders should adopt a macro-hedge fund mindset, constructing portfolios that bet on the correlation and causality between these events, rather than on any single outcome. The coming year will be a stress test for both the political system and the predictive efficiency of these markets.

Market Analysis

Donald Trump out this year? ➡️

Current Probability: 50.0%

Central risk node. Price reflects extreme uncertainty, not a balanced forecast. Key signal for all other markets.

Will there be a recession in 2025? 📈

Current Probability: 1.0%

Severely underpriced tail risk. Direct functional link to political stability market. Asymmetric upside in a shock scenario.

Will the Fed cut rates 2 times? 📈

Current Probability: 6.0%

Pricing in policy continuity. Highly sensitive to a political or market crisis, which would force aggressive easing.

Will Bitcoin be above $100,000 by Dec 31, 2025? 📈

Current Probability: 11.0%

Modest probability reflects base-case stability. Acts as a non-linear hedge against dollar and political regime risk. Correlate with Trump exit probability.

Powell leaves before 2026? ➡️

Current Probability: 1.0%

Priced for status quo. Secondary effect market; probability would rise in a Democratic administration succession scenario.