SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all · 9 outcomes9 contractsPolymarketrefreshed 3 min agoCloses May 5, 2026 · 1d20pp · 10h

Qingdao Xihaian FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC - More Markets

Leader sits at 72% across 9 bound outcomes, runner-up at 53%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

72%

O/U 1.5

runner-up 53¢leader 72¢

Outcomes

9

winner-take-all

Runner-up

53¢

Both Teams to Score

Spread

19pp

contested

24h volume

$54

thin orderbook

Closes

May 5, 2026

1 days

Venue

Polymarket

9 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayO/U 1.5: 73% (2 days, 2 points)O/U 1.5: 73% on 2026-05-02Both Teams to Score: 53% (2 days, 2 points)Both Teams to Score: 53% on 2026-05-02O/U 2.5: 47% (2 days, 2 points)O/U 2.5: 47% on 2026-05-02
O/U 1.573¢Both Teams to Score53¢O/U 2.547¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 2d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This 52% probability indicates traders assess a higher than even-money chance that both Qingdao Xihaian FC and Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC will score in their matchup. The probability reflects market expectations about offensive firepower and defensive vulnerabilities in this Chinese football fixture. Trading volume remains modest at $91 across contracts, suggesting limited consensus. The outcome hinges on whether either team can contain the other's scoring threats and capitalize on available chances. The match itself serves as the immediate resolution point—traders are effectively pricing recent form, team quality, and head-to-head tendencies leading into kickoff. Historical scoring patterns between these clubs and current-season goal-scoring rates will be primary inputs for any position reassessment. Relative to the underdog Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC contract trading at 28¢, the Both Teams to Score price implies reasonable balance in competitive quality.

  • Qingdao leads the head-to-head win probability at 45¢ vs. Tianjin's 28¢, suggesting modest offensive advantage but insufficient to strongly suppress mutual scoring expectations
  • Recent season goal-scoring efficiency and defensive records for both clubs will determine whether 52% reflects realistic two-way offensive threat or overprices one team's weakness
  • 24-hour trading volume of $91 on the win contracts indicates low liquidity and potential for sharp moves if new information (team news, lineup changes) surfaces before kickoff
  • The related Over/Under 2.5 goal market pricing at 47¢ suggests traders expect 2–3 total goals, which is compatible with but not dependent on both teams scoring
  • Match date and kick-off time relative to squad availability, injuries, or other fixture congestion could shift offensive focus or defensive organization

What moved the line

  • May 3Qingdao Xihaian FC (-1.5)10pp2535¢ · Polymarket
  • May 3O/U 4.510pp1626¢ · Polymarket
  • May 2Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC (-1.5)9pp2920¢ · Polymarket
  • May 2Qingdao Xihaian FC (-2.5)7pp3023¢ · Polymarket
  • May 2O/U 4.55pp2116¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: 3 min ago.