Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets
Leader sits at 78% across 9 bound outcomes, runner-up at 57%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.
Leader probability
O/U 1.5
Outcomes
9
winner-take-all
Runner-up
57¢
O/U 2.5
Spread
21pp
contested
24h volume
$321
thin orderbook
Closes
May 6, 2026
3 days
Venue
Polymarket
9 bound
30-day trend
Bracket family
How the bracket ladder is priced.
Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.
Cluster 1
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC (-2.5)
0x96f320…71c5
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: O/U 2.5
0x64562d…92f6
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: Both Teams to Score
0x9ba015…d92d
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: O/U 4.5
0x17c39c…a344
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: O/U 3.5
0x71de78…f592
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: Shanghai Haigang FC (-1.5)
0xaa75cd…8883
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: O/U 1.5
0x06629a…cd4f
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: Shanghai Haigang FC (-2.5)
0x8f9476…0be2
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC - More Markets: Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC (-1.5)
0x29a5a0…d6f3
Analysis
The market currently prices Shanghai Haigang FC as having a 51% chance of winning against Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC, suggesting a slight lean toward Shanghai but with substantial uncertainty remaining. This probability is driven by relative team strength, current league standings, and recent form data available to traders. The match outcome will be determined on the scheduled game date, which represents the primary catalyst for resolving this uncertainty. Liquidity remains modest at $306 in 24-hour volume on the leading contract, indicating limited depth in pricing consensus. Traders are simultaneously assessing related markets on goal totals and alternative outcomes, with significant price dispersion visible across linked contracts—the Shanghai moneyline trading at 64¢ while Shenzhen spreads trade lower, reflecting complex position-taking rather than unified sentiment.
- ›Shanghai Haigang FC trades as 51% favorite, only 12 percentage points above the second-most-likely outcome at 39%, indicating genuine competitive uncertainty
- ›The associated spread market (Shenzhen at -2.5) trades at only 11¢, suggesting the market assigns meaningful probability to Shanghai winning outright or by a small margin
- ›24-hour volume of $306 on the top contract is relatively low for a head-to-head match prediction, indicating thin liquidity and potential for price movement on new information
- ›Goal total markets (O/U 2.5) trade at 57¢-67¢, pricing for lower-scoring outcomes which may correlate with defensive team capabilities
- ›Significant price divergence between moneyline and spread contracts suggests traders hold heterogeneous views on margin of victory, not just winner identity
What moved the line
- May 3Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC (-1.5)↑6pp17→23¢ · Polymarket
More like this
Adjacent prediction questions.
In general
How we compute these odds
SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.
For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.
Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.
Last updated on this page: 23 min ago.