SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all · 3 outcomes3 contractsPolymarketrefreshed 4 min agoCloses Jun 2, 2026 · 24d

NJ-12 Democratic Primary Winner

Leader sits at 75% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 13%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

75%

Adam Hamawy

runner-up 13¢leader 75¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

13¢

Verlina Reynolds-Jackson

Spread

62pp

dominant leader

24h volume

$528

thin orderbook

Closes

Jun 2, 2026

24 days

Venue

Polymarket

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAdam Hamawy: 69% (28 days, 24 points)Adam Hamawy: 69% on 2026-05-08Verlina Reynolds-Jackson: 13% (28 days, 25 points)Verlina Reynolds-Jackson: 13% on 2026-05-03Susan Altman: 14% (28 days, 26 points)Susan Altman: 14% on 2026-05-06
Adam Hamawy69¢Verlina Reynolds-Jackson13¢Susan Altman14¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 28d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

The 50% probability indicates that market participants view one particular candidate as having a slight edge in the NJ-12 Democratic primary race, though the outcome remains substantially uncertain. The current pricing reflects competitive primary dynamics where multiple candidates likely hold viable paths to nomination. Movement in this probability would depend primarily on campaign momentum, fundraising announcements, and polling data as primary day approaches. The primary election results will definitively resolve this market, eliminating uncertainty around the eventual Democratic nominee in this district. Market participants are monitoring candidate performance in early voting periods, local endorsement patterns, and any shifts in voter registration or turnout indicators that could signal changing dynamics in the race.

  • The leading candidate is priced at 50%, indicating marginal frontrunner status rather than prohibitive favorite odds
  • The runner-up at 13% suggests a compressed field with multiple viable alternatives rather than a two-person contest
  • Trading volume of $816 in the top Polymarket contract indicates moderate but not high liquidity, potentially limiting price discovery
  • No single candidate has achieved dominant pricing above 60%, suggesting material uncertainty about electability or voter preferences remains
  • The multi-outcome structure with six bound contracts implies at least 3-4 candidates with measurable support and organizational capacity

What moved the line

  • May 6Adam Hamawy20pp4767¢ · Polymarket
  • May 2Verlina Reynolds-Jackson8pp2113¢ · Polymarket
  • May 2Adam Hamawy4pp4448¢ · Polymarket
  • May 8Adam Hamawy4pp6569¢ · Polymarket
  • May 3Susan Altman3pp1114¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in election 2026

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in election 2026.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: 4 min ago.