SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all · 3 outcomes3 contractsPolymarketrefreshed 3 min agoCloses Jun 28, 2026 · 50d

Algeria vs. Austria

Leader sits at 41% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 40%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

41%

Austria

runner-up 40¢leader 41¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

40¢

Algeria

Spread

1pp

contested

24h volume

$134

thin orderbook

Closes

Jun 28, 2026

50 days

Venue

Polymarket

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAustria: 42% (6 days, 6 points)Austria: 42% on 2026-05-08Algeria: 40% (6 days, 6 points)Algeria: 40% on 2026-05-08
Austria42¢Algeria40¢
Top 2 candidates by current price · 6d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This 32% probability reflects the combined market expectation that Algeria will defeat Austria in an upcoming match. The significant 20-percentage-point gap between Polymarket (35%) and Kalshi (15%) suggests disagreement about Algeria's chances, potentially driven by different assessments of recent form, head-to-head records, or team composition. Volume concentration in Argentina-Algeria contracts rather than Austria-Algeria contracts indicates less direct market certainty about the specific Austria matchup. The outcome will be determined when the match is played, making team news, injury status, and lineup announcements in the days prior key drivers of any probability shifts before the event resolves.

  • Polymarket prices Algeria at 35% versus Kalshi at 15%, indicating a substantial venue-level disagreement that may reflect different user bases or information sets
  • The top-volume contract is Argentina vs. Algeria (not Austria), suggesting market participants have more conviction about other matchups in this tournament or series
  • Austria trades at 73% against Jordan and Algeria at 60% against Jordan in separate contracts, creating potential arbitrage implications if these represent the same tournament structure
  • No clear scheduled date visible in the data; resolution timing and whether this is a knockout or group-stage match would influence probability stability
  • The relatively low absolute volumes across most contracts ($0–$349 per 24h) indicate thin liquidity, making individual large trades more likely to move probabilities significantly

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: 3 min ago.