SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·7 source contracts·Polymarket 7·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2028 · 582d

XMAQUINA FDV above ___ one day after launch?

Bracket$10M

Leader sits at 84% across 7 bound outcomes, runner-up at 13%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

84%

$40M

runner-up 13¢leader 84¢

Outcomes

7

winner-take-all

Runner-up

13¢

$80M

Spread

71pp

dominant leader

24h volume

$11K

liquid

Closes

Jan 1, 2028

582 days

Venue

Polymarket

7 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtoday$40M: 53% (4 days, 4 points)$40M: 53% on 2026-05-28$80M: 23% (4 days, 4 points)$80M: 23% on 2026-05-28$60M: 36% (4 days, 4 points)$60M: 36% on 2026-05-28
$40M53¢$80M23¢$60M36¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 4d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This contract measures the probability that XMAQUINA will achieve a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of at least $10 million within one day of its token launch. The 97% probability reflects near-certainty in the market that this modest valuation threshold will be met. The wide gap between the $10M contract (97¢) and higher thresholds like $40M (50¢) and $150M (43¢) suggests traders expect the token to launch successfully and reach initial trading valuations, but are far less confident about significantly higher outcomes. The primary driver is whether the launch executes on schedule with sufficient liquidity and buyer interest to achieve even the lowest threshold. Resolution depends on the launch date and how FDV is calculated—typically by multiplying token price by total supply at the moment trading begins. Upside risks include stronger-than-expected demand or a larger initial supply, while downside risks involve launch delays, regulatory issues, or minimal initial trading volume.

  • Launch execution status and timing remain the core uncertainty—delays or technical failures would pressure the $10M threshold down
  • Initial token liquidity and order book depth at launch will directly determine achievable FDV; insufficient trading volume could prevent price discovery at claimed valuations
  • Total token supply announced at launch directly multiplies with opening price to determine FDV; larger supply pools risk valuation
  • Market demand relative to other comparable token launches; comparison to similar projects' first-day valuations provides calibration
  • Definition and verification of FDV used for resolution—whether it includes all outstanding tokens or only circulating supply affects threshold achievability

What moved the line

  • May 28$80M25pp4823¢ · Polymarket
  • May 28$40M24pp7753¢ · Polymarket
  • May 26$40M23pp5073¢ · Polymarket
  • May 28$100M16pp3620¢ · Polymarket
  • May 28$60M15pp5136¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.