SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all · 3 outcomes3 contractsPolymarketrefreshed 4 min agoCloses Jun 23, 2026 · 45d

Jordan vs. Algeria

Leader sits at 60% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 27%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

60%

Algeria

runner-up 27¢leader 60¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

27¢

Draw (Jordan vs. Algeria)

Spread

33pp

contested

24h volume

$0

thin orderbook

Closes

Jun 23, 2026

45 days

Venue

Polymarket

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAlgeria: 61% (7 days, 5 points)Algeria: 61% on 2026-05-08Draw (Jordan vs. Algeria): 26% (7 days, 5 points)Draw (Jordan vs. Algeria): 26% on 2026-05-07Jordan: 16% (7 days, 6 points)Jordan: 16% on 2026-05-08
Algeria61¢Draw (Jordan vs. Algeria)26¢Jordan16¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 7d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

The 60% probability indicates market participants currently favor Algeria to win in a matchup against Jordan. This assessment reflects aggregate trading on multiple prediction contracts, where Algeria's contract trades significantly higher than alternatives. The probability is shaped by relative team strength assessments, recent performance records, and any available match-specific information. Movement would likely follow confirmed team lineups, injury announcements, or venue details. The resolution will occur when the match concludes and an official result is recorded, eliminating all remaining uncertainty around the outcome.

  • Algeria's contract price (60¢) substantially exceeds Jordan's implied probability (27% based on runner-up positioning), suggesting market confidence in Algeria as the favored outcome
  • Trading volume on the Jordan vs. Algeria contract is currently zero over 24 hours, indicating thin liquidity and potential for price movement if significant new information emerges
  • The Argentina vs. Algeria contracts show active trading ($273 24h volume) with Argentina trading at 71¢, providing indirect signals about comparative strength assessments across different matchups
  • Match-specific variables—team roster availability, recent form, head-to-head history, and scheduling details—remain the primary drivers of probability shifts
  • Official match result is the sole resolution mechanism; any delay, postponement, or format change would extend uncertainty and potentially shift market prices

What moved the line

  • May 3Jordan3pp1821¢ · Polymarket
  • May 7Jordan3pp2118¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: 4 min ago.