SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all · 8 outcomes8 contractsPolymarketrefreshed 4 min agoCloses Jan 1, 2028 · 602d

Neutrl FDV above ___ one day after launch?

Bracket$100M

Leader sits at 84% across 8 bound outcomes, runner-up at 57%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

84%

$20M

runner-up 57¢leader 84¢

Outcomes

8

winner-take-all

Runner-up

57¢

$50M

Spread

27pp

contested

24h volume

$0

thin orderbook

Closes

Jan 1, 2028

602 days

Venue

Polymarket

8 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtoday$20M: 84% (28 days, 27 points)$20M: 84% on 2026-05-08$50M: 57% (28 days, 28 points)$50M: 57% on 2026-05-08$100M: 50% (28 days, 28 points)$100M: 50% on 2026-05-08
$20M84¢$50M57¢$100M50¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 28d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This contract reflects market participants' view that Neutrl's fully diluted valuation (FDV) will exceed $100 million within one day of its launch. The 64% probability indicates traders consider this outcome likely but not certain. The market's confidence level is notably influenced by comparable token launches and typical FDV levels at debut, as well as the project's pre-launch positioning and investor interest. Key upside pressures include strong demand at launch and early trading momentum, while downside risks involve post-launch volatility and valuation resets. Resolution depends entirely on Neutrl's actual FDV calculation one day after launch becomes public, which represents the single definitive catalyst that will determine whether this contract settles as true or false.

  • Current price of 64% reflects material probability but not consensus certainty; runner-up outcome at 54% shows significant remaining disagreement
  • Related contracts show the market pricing lower FDV thresholds ($500M, $100M brackets) at substantially higher probabilities, suggesting FDV floor expectations vary by contract
  • Volume concentration in competing contracts ($5580-$6051 daily volume) indicates active trading around adjacent price points rather than concentrated conviction
  • Polymarket aggregation from 7 distinct contracts means outcome reflects distributed opinion rather than single centralized forecast
  • Resolution requires precise FDV calculation methodology one day post-launch; ambiguity in how FDV is measured could influence final settlement

What moved the line

  • May 6$20M21pp6485¢ · Polymarket
  • May 6$200M15pp4328¢ · Polymarket
  • May 6$500M13pp2310¢ · Polymarket
  • May 3$200M8pp3543¢ · Polymarket
  • May 6$300M8pp4234¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: 4 min ago.