SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·6 source contracts·Polymarket 6·refreshed just now·Closes Aug 18, 2026 · 82d

CA-14 Special Election Winner

Leader sits at 74% across 6 bound outcomes, runner-up at 16%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

74%

Aisha Wahab

runner-up 16¢leader 74¢

Outcomes

6

winner-take-all

Runner-up

16¢

Melissa Hernandez

Spread

58pp

dominant leader

24h volume

$9

thin orderbook

Closes

Aug 18, 2026

82 days

Venue

Polymarket

6 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAisha Wahab: 74% (19 days, 18 points)Aisha Wahab: 74% on 2026-05-26Melissa Hernandez: 5% (19 days, 18 points)Melissa Hernandez: 5% on 2026-05-27Carin Elam: 3% (19 days, 18 points)Carin Elam: 3% on 2026-05-26
Aisha Wahab74¢Melissa Hernandez5¢Carin Elam3¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 19d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

The market assigns an 82% probability to Aisha Wahab winning California's 14th congressional district special election, with runner-up Rakhi Israni Singh at 32%. This reflects the betting market's assessment of Wahab's likelihood of victory based on available information about candidate positioning, endorsements, and voter sentiment in the district. The high probability for Wahab suggests traders view her as the frontrunner, though the 32% price on Singh indicates material uncertainty remains. The election itself will resolve this outcome definitively. Factors driving the current level include candidate fundraising totals, prior electoral performance in the district, demographic alignment with voters, and any recent polling or endorsement shifts. A special election date would serve as the primary catalyst that narrows or closes remaining uncertainty.

  • Aisha Wahab's price (82¢) exceeds Singh's (32¢) by 50 percentage points, indicating asymmetric trader conviction about relative viability
  • The top three candidates (Wahab, Singh, Ortega) account for roughly 123¢ of implied probability across contracts, suggesting high fragmentation or overlap in market pricing
  • Zero trading volume across all contracts in the past 24 hours indicates low current market activity and potential staleness of probability estimates
  • Candidate names and backgrounds would need to be cross-referenced against California voter registration, past special election results, and recent fundraising disclosures for validation
  • The special election date and candidate qualification deadlines determine the timing and final field, either confirming or disrupting current price signals

What moved the line

  • May 20Matt Ortega21pp243¢ · Polymarket
  • May 25Carin Elam21pp324¢ · Polymarket
  • May 26Carin Elam21pp243¢ · Polymarket
  • May 26Melissa Hernandez13pp196¢ · Polymarket
  • May 25Rakhi Israni Singh12pp1224¢ · Polymarket

Recently closed in election 2026

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in election 2026.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.