SimpleFunctions
ClosedLast odds shown below are frozen at close (Jun 19, 2026). Future questions tracked on /odds.
Winner-take-all answer·2 source contracts·Polymarket 2·closed just now·Closes Nov 7, 2028 · 872d

Presidential Election Winner 2028

Leader sits at 17% across 2 bound outcomes, runner-up at 16%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

17%

JD Vance

runner-up 16¢leader 17¢

Outcomes

2

winner-take-all

Runner-up

16¢

Marco Rubio

Spread

1pp

contested

24h volume

$28K

liquid

Closes

Nov 7, 2028

872 days

Venue

Polymarket

2 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayJD Vance: 17% (19 days, 6 points)JD Vance: 17% on 2026-06-17Marco Rubio: 16% (19 days, 15 points)Marco Rubio: 16% on 2026-06-14
JD Vance17¢Marco Rubio16¢
Top 2 candidates by current price · 19d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This probability reflects market participants' assessment that Gavin Newsom has an 18% chance of winning the 2028 U.S. presidential election. The current level suggests traders view him as a meaningful but not dominant contender among potential candidates. Market prices reflect uncertainty about candidate field formation, primary outcomes, and general election dynamics still years away. Key drivers of this probability include Newsom's recent national profile and policy positions, weighed against questions about primary viability and general election electability. The field remains highly fragmented, with the top candidate claiming only 18% odds—indicating substantial uncertainty. Upcoming factors that could shift these odds include formal candidate announcements, major legislative outcomes, economic data affecting incumbent party prospects, and early primary voting when it occurs in 2027-2028.

  • Newsom's 18% probability ranks first among six tracked candidates, yet represents only 18 cents on the dollar, indicating very high uncertainty about the eventual nominee
  • Trading volume on Newsom contracts ($27,375 in 24 hours) is substantial but comparable to other candidates, suggesting reasoned disagreement rather than consensus
  • The contract structure captures only six specific individuals; market-wide probabilities for 'any Democrat' or 'any Republican' would show how much uncertainty derives from candidate selection versus general election factors
  • No scheduled primary voting occurs until early 2027, meaning current pricing reflects long-term expectations about candidate viability and party dynamics rather than near-term electoral data
  • Newsom's proximity to Trump (3¢) and Carlson (4¢) in market odds suggests these contracts price narrative momentum and media attention as much as structural electoral advantages

Recently closed in election 2026

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

Lateral coverage

Thin contract — here's where the deeper coverage is.

This page aggregates 2 contracts (17% headline). At low contract count, the price reflects two participants’ opinions, not a market consensus. The links below are heavier related questions where the orderbook signal is real.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.