SimpleFunctions

Filippo Mazzola vs Mario Arce Fernandez for ITF Xativa

ITF Xativa: Filippo Mazzola vs Mario Arce Fernandez is priced at 50¢ on Polymarket. Current book: 68¢ bid, 78¢ ask, 10¢ spread. This page tracks a standalone prediction-market contract.

Price history

50¢ current

50¢
Jul 28, 2026Jul 28, 2026

Contract brief

This market refers to the tennis match between Filippo Mazzola and Mario Arce Fernandez in the ITF Men Xativa, originally scheduled for July 29, 2026 at 11:45AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Filippo Mazzola' if Filippo Mazzola advances against Mario Arce Fernandez. This market will resolve to 'Mario Arce Fernandez' if Mario Arce Fernandez advances against Filippo Mazzola. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Outcome

ITF Xativa: Filippo Mazzola vs Mario Arce Fernandez

Rank

Standalone

Leader

Range

Family volume

$0

Identifier

0xb59585aa...7eab

Jul 28, 2026, 10:21 PM UTC · 0m ago

Implied probability

50¢
Latest venue quote
Jul 28, 2026, 10:21 PM UTC · 0m ago

Bid

68¢

Ask

78¢

Spread

10¢

Reported volume

$0

Family rank

Standalone

Standalone contract

Closes

Aug 5, 2026

Family volume

$0

Orderbook snapshot

68 / 78¢

Polymarket
10¢ spread
BidSize
100¢5
68¢15
3¢50
2¢1.5K
AskSize
78¢15
97¢50
98¢1.5K
99¢5

Contract terms

What resolves this market.

YES condition

This market refers to the tennis match between Filippo Mazzola and Mario Arce Fernandez in the ITF Men Xativa, originally scheduled for July 29, 2026 at 11:45AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Filippo Mazzola' if Filippo Mazzola advances against Mario Arce Fernandez. This market will resolve to 'Mario Arce Fernandez' if Mario Arce Fernandez advances against Filippo Mazzola. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Venue

Polymarket

Closes

Aug 5, 2026

Identifier

0xb59585aa…7eab

SF Signal
Regime
neutral

Event family

This market.

The same race as a probability stack: rank, volume, and where this contract sits against the other outcomes.

Total volume

$0

Outcomes

1

Highest price

ITF Xativa: Filippo Mazzola vs Mario Arce Fernandez 50¢

Current share

Indicators

Yield, cliff risk, volatility, and regime.

Regime

neutral

Score

0.5

Related readings

Matched from SimpleFunctions blog, opinions, technical guides, concepts, and learn pages.

Browse library
Opinionanalysis

Liquidity Availability Is the Real Edge in Prediction Markets

Implied yield, cliff risk, and overround all describe what to trade. Liquidity Availability Score describes whether the orderbook can absorb the trade. Why LAS is the indicator that decides who actually books P&L.

Blogmarkets

Kalshi vs Polymarket: Which Prediction Market Should You Trade?

In-depth comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket for prediction market traders. Regulatory structure, liquidity, fees, API tooling, and cross-venue trading with SimpleFunctions.

Opinioncomparison

Kalshi vs Polymarket: Mechanics, Fees, Regulation, Liquidity (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket in 2026. Fee math, calibration data, withdrawal speed, and a decision tree for picking the right venue.

Conceptmethodology

Resolution Risk Premium: Pricing the Rule, Not the Outcome

When the resolution rule is fuzzy, the price is the market's estimate of how the rule will be interpreted, not the outcome's probability. Three case studies and the discount math.

Conceptmethodology

Maker / Taker Regime in Prediction Markets: How to Read the Orderbook State

Three regime states (maker-dominated, taker-dominated, neutral) and how to read which one a Kalshi or Polymarket contract is in. Strategy follows regime, not thesis.

Opinionanalysis

Information Finance Has Arrived: A Material Map of Prediction Markets in Q2 2026

Combined Kalshi + Polymarket volume hit $66B in just four months of 2026 — already greater than the entire 2025 industry total. Bernstein projects $1T by 2030. Two venues hold 95% of US share. The distribution layer fragmented across nine retail surfaces. AI agents are 30% of Polymarket wallet activ

SimpleFunctions context

Index, screen, query, and monitor.

Open index

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.