SimpleFunctions
KalshiNov 8, 2026

Will Kelsey Plum lead Women's Pro Basketball in points per game for the 2026 regular season?

This contract is priced at 9¢ on Kalshi. Current book: 2¢ bid, 12¢ ask, 10¢ spread.

Implied probability

9¢
$438 volume
$438 liquidity
221% of event volume

Event outcomes

6

Family volume

$199

Best sibling

A'ja Wilson 36¢

Ticker

KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26-KPLUM10

Market snapshot

Kelsey Plum in market context.

This page tracks the Kalshi contract for Will Kelsey Plum lead Women's Pro Basketball in points per game for the 2026 regular season?. The displayed quote is 9¢ from the latest venue quote. The cached market record reports 24h volume of $182. In the KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26 family, this outcome ranks #5 of 6 by current quote across 6 sibling outcomes. The indicator bundle was refreshed May 9, 2026, 6:01 AM UTC.

Outcome

Kelsey Plum

Family rank

#5 of 6

Venue

Kalshi

Current quote

Quote source

Latest venue quote

Timing

Listed until Nov 8, 2026

24h volume

$182

Family context

6 outcomes · KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26

Quote range

2¢-36¢

Family leader

A'ja Wilson 36¢

Last updated

May 9, 2026, 6:01 AM UTC · 0m ago

Venue identifier: KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26-KPLUM10. Family volume: $199.

Price history

9¢ current

25¢50¢75¢100¢
May 9, 2026May 9, 2026

Orderbook snapshot

2 / 12¢

Kalshi
10¢ spread
BidSize
2¢250
AskSize
12¢5
13¢250
96¢50
97¢4.9K

Contract terms

Resolution, venue, and identifiers.

Resolution rules

If Kelsey Plum leads Women's Pro Basketball in points per game for the 2026 regular season, then the market resolves to Yes.

Venue

Kalshi

Closes

Nov 8, 2026

Identifier

KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26-KPLUM10

Event family

KXLEADERWNBAPTS-26.

This view keeps the individual contract next to its sibling outcomes. For long-tail search traffic, this is the useful context: where the current price sits inside the event, how much volume exists around the family, and which outcomes have actual depth.

Total volume

$199

Outcomes

6

Highest price

A'ja Wilson 36¢

Current share

91%

Indicators

Yield, cliff risk, volatility, and regime.

Regime

neutral

Score

0.5

Related readings

Matched from SimpleFunctions blog, opinions, technical guides, concepts, and learn pages.

Browse library
Blogmarkets

Kalshi vs Polymarket: Which Prediction Market Should You Trade?

In-depth comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket for prediction market traders. Regulatory structure, liquidity, fees, API tooling, and cross-venue trading with SimpleFunctions.

Opinioncomparison

Kalshi vs Polymarket: Mechanics, Fees, Regulation, Liquidity (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket in 2026. Fee math, calibration data, withdrawal speed, and a decision tree for picking the right venue.

Blogmarkets

Prediction Market Orderbook Analysis: Reading Depth, Spread, and Liquidity

How to read prediction market orderbooks. Binary settlement, spread-as-percentage, depth asymmetry, executable edge calculation, and cross-venue arbitrage analysis.

Technicalguide

Kalshi vs Polymarket: A Developer's Comparison of APIs, Orderbooks, and Liquidity

Data-driven comparison of Kalshi and Polymarket APIs, orderbooks, rate limits, and liquidity. Code examples for building on both prediction markets.

Opinionanalysis

Liquidity Availability Is the Real Edge in Prediction Markets

Implied yield, cliff risk, and overround all describe what to trade. Liquidity Availability Score describes whether the orderbook can absorb the trade. Why LAS is the indicator that decides who actually books P&L.

Opinionanalysis

Market Making on Polymarket: Why Maker Status Cuts Loss Probability by 36 Points — and Why Spreads Persist Anyway

Akey et al.'s most economically significant finding: moving from pure taker to pure maker status reduces the probability of losing money by ~36 percentage points on Polymarket. Resolution-spec risk is why cross-platform spreads persist at 1.5–4.5% and why even Susquehanna and Jump can't fully arb them.

SimpleFunctions context

Index, screen, query, and monitor.

Open index