SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·3 source contracts·Kalshi 3·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2029 · 839d

Will Putin and Zelenskyy meet in person before Jan 1, 2027

Leader sits at 20% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 11%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

20%

Before Jan 1, 2029

runner-up 11¢leader 20¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

11¢

Before Jan 1, 2028

Spread

9pp

contested

24h volume

$0

thin orderbook

Closes

Jan 1, 2029

839 days

Venue

Kalshi

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayBefore Jan 1, 2029: 20% (6 days, 3 points)Before Jan 1, 2029: 20% on 2026-09-11Before Jan 1, 2028: 14% on 2026-09-04Before Jan 1, 2027: 4% (6 days, 4 points)Before Jan 1, 2027: 4% on 2026-09-12
Before Jan 1, 202920¢Before Jan 1, 202814¢Before Jan 1, 20274¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 6d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

Markets currently assign a 20% probability that Putin and Zelenskyy will meet in person before January 1, 2027—roughly four months from today. This reflects skepticism about near-term diplomatic breakthrough given the ongoing military conflict, though the extended timeline through 2029 shows meaningful probability mass (20%) for eventual face-to-face engagement. The primary drivers of current low odds are the absence of active peace negotiations, geographic separation, and security risks. A meaningful shift would require either a significant military stalemate prompting ceasefire talks, third-party diplomatic intervention, or declarative statements from either leader signaling openness to direct engagement. The October 2026 U.S. election outcome and any subsequent diplomatic posturing may influence expectations, though no scheduled meeting date or negotiation framework currently exists to serve as a concrete catalyst.

  • No active peace negotiations or diplomatic framework involving direct presidential engagement currently exists as of September 2026
  • The 4-month window (Sept-Dec 2026) represents a compressed timeframe for organizing a summit given security requirements and political conditions in both countries
  • Market probability rises substantially to 20% for a 2029 meeting, suggesting traders believe multi-year conflict de-escalation or settlement is more plausible than imminent talks
  • Historical precedent shows even hostile state leaders occasionally meet during conflicts (e.g., Minsk agreements featured in-person diplomatic engagement), though Ukraine-Russia tensions remain significantly elevated
  • A material catalyst would be either military developments forcing stalemate or explicit diplomatic signals from either leader; absence of either keeps near-term odds depressed

What moved the line

  • Sep 10Before Jan 1, 20275pp16¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in ukraine

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in ukraine.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.