SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·7 source contracts·Kalshi 7·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2027 · 131d

Will a Russia sanctions bill receive above 300 Yea votes in the House

Leader sits at 69% across 7 bound outcomes, runner-up at 52%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

69%

Above 250

runner-up 52¢leader 69¢

Outcomes

7

winner-take-all

Runner-up

52¢

Above 275

Spread

17pp

contested

24h volume

$0

thin orderbook

Closes

Jan 1, 2027

131 days

Venue

Kalshi

7 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAbove 250: 69% (12 days, 7 points)Above 250: 69% on 2026-08-22Above 275: 51% (12 days, 12 points)Above 275: 51% on 2026-08-22Above 300: 41% (12 days, 6 points)Above 300: 41% on 2026-08-22
Above 25069¢Above 27551¢Above 30041¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 12d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This contract chain measures whether a Russia-focused sanctions bill will pass the House with at least 300 affirmative votes. The 42¢ price on the 300-vote threshold reflects moderate confidence such legislation will advance, though with meaningful uncertainty about whether it will secure a true bipartisan supermajority rather than a narrower partisan majority. Support hinges on the severity of geopolitical developments, the bill's specific provisions, and whether it attracts cooperation across the aisle. The 29-point gap between the 250-vote baseline (71%) and the 300-vote target (42%) suggests traders expect the bill to clear a simple majority but doubt it will reach near-consensus. Key resolution drivers include whether the bill reaches a House floor vote before Congress adjourns, the composition of any measure that advances, and real-time shifts in US-Russia relations or related sanctions debates.

  • Current bid-ask spreads show lower confidence in 300+ votes (42¢) versus 250+ votes (71¢), indicating traders expect passage above simple majority but well below historical supermajority thresholds
  • High-volume trading on the 275-vote contract (55¢, $345 24h volume) versus near-zero volume on 325+ and 350+ suggests active disagreement in the 250–300 vote band, the decision threshold
  • The bill's underlying provisions and any recent Russia-related escalations will likely determine whether Democrats and Republicans align sufficiently to exceed 300 votes
  • House voting dynamics often reflect party-line splits; breaking 300 votes typically requires substantial cross-party support or near-unanimous participation from both sides
  • Timing of floor votes and procedural considerations before session end or recess could accelerate or delay resolution and shift trader expectations

What moved the line

  • Aug 19Above 3258pp1927¢ · Kalshi
  • Aug 20Above 3507pp1118¢ · Kalshi
  • Aug 20Above 2506pp6963¢ · Kalshi
  • Aug 20Above 3004pp4541¢ · Kalshi
  • Aug 21Above 2503pp6366¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in ukraine

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in ukraine.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.