SimpleFunctions
4 source contracts·Kalshi 4·refreshed just now·Closes Jul 5, 2026 · 10d

Will any African nation win their group in the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup

Liquidity-weighted aggregate sits at 44% across 4 Kalshi contracts.

Implied probability

44%
0%50%100%

Kalshi

44%

4 contracts

Polymarket

not bound

Cross-venue gap

single venue

24h move

no pin

24h volume

$3K

4 contracts

Closes

Jul 5, 2026

10 days

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAggregate: 40% (31 days, 31 points)Aggregate: 40% on 2026-06-25
Aggregate of 4 contracts · 31d

Bracket families

4 clusters across 4 contracts.

These contracts were grouped by title similarity. The headline aggregate combines all clusters; verify the cluster you actually need before quoting a number.

Cluster 1

Will any African nation win their group in the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup

1 contract$3K

Cluster 2

Will any island nation win their group in the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup

1 contract$86

Cluster 3

Will any Asian/Oceanic nations win their group in the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup

1 contract$2

Cluster 4

Will any South American nation win their group in the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup

1 contract$0

Analysis

This market reflects the likelihood that at least one African nation will finish first in their World Cup group during the 2026 tournament, currently priced at 34%. African representation in group-winning positions depends on draw composition, relative team strength, and performance. The probability sits well below South American nations (89%) but above Asian/Oceanic teams (9%), suggesting moderate but below-average odds. Key factors include which African teams draw together in the group stage, the strength of their direct competition, and recent tournament performance trajectories. The groups will be determined by the official draw scheduled before the tournament begins. Historically, African nations rarely top groups containing European or South American powerhouses, limiting pathways for group wins despite occasional competitive African squads.

  • African teams' historical group-stage performance shows few instances of topping groups with European or strong South American opposition
  • 2026 draw composition will determine whether African nations face weaker opponents or consolidate in groups with fellow African teams
  • Recent African qualifying performance and current FIFA rankings of teams likely to qualify affect competitive viability in group play
  • Tournament format places African nations in predetermined groups where draw luck significantly influences realistic chances of group advancement
  • Comparison to 9% odds for Asian/Oceanic groups versus 89% for South American suggests market assessment of relative continental strength in 2026

What moved the line

  • Jun 24Any African nation to win their group36pp8246¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 22Any African nation to win their group33pp4275¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 20Any Asian/Oceanic nations to win their group21pp3817¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 20Any African nation to win their group19pp6041¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 18Any Asian/Oceanic nations to win their group16pp6751¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in sports

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.