SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·4 source contracts·Kalshi 4·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2027 · 189d

Will Central Bank of Brazil rate cuts for 2026 be exactly 3

Leader sits at 48% across 4 bound outcomes, runner-up at 34%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

48%

Exactly 4 cuts

runner-up 34¢leader 48¢

Outcomes

4

winner-take-all

Runner-up

34¢

Exactly 5 cuts

Spread

14pp

contested

24h volume

$490

thin orderbook

Closes

Jan 1, 2027

189 days

Venue

Kalshi

4 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayExactly 4 cuts: 48% (25 days, 20 points)Exactly 4 cuts: 48% on 2026-06-26Exactly 5 cuts: 32% (25 days, 17 points)Exactly 5 cuts: 32% on 2026-06-26Exactly 3 cuts: 16% (25 days, 22 points)Exactly 3 cuts: 16% on 2026-06-26
Exactly 4 cuts48¢Exactly 5 cuts32¢Exactly 3 cuts16¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 25d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

Market participants are pricing a 44% probability that Brazil's central bank will cut rates exactly 3 times during 2026, with roughly equal market interest in scenarios involving 2, 4, or 5 cuts. The current leadership of the "exactly 3" outcome reflects moderate consensus, though nearly 40% of remaining probability is distributed across alternative cut counts, indicating genuine uncertainty about the path of monetary policy. Expectations for Brazilian rate cuts depend primarily on inflation trends relative to the central bank's target and the trajectory of real interest rates needed to manage price stability. The biggest determinant will be inflation data releases throughout 2026 and any shifts in the central bank's policy guidance. Each quarterly inflation report and policy meeting decision will progressively narrow the range of plausible outcomes, with particular attention to whether headline inflation moves closer to or further from the target band.

  • Current market prices show 3 cuts at 44%, 2 cuts at 15%, and 4-5 cuts combined at 48%, indicating the exact number remains genuinely uncertain
  • Trading volume is highest on the 2-cut contract ($366 24h), suggesting active disagreement about whether fewer cuts than the market leader will occur
  • Brazil's inflation rate relative to the central bank's target will be the primary driver—faster disinflation increases likelihood of 4+ cuts, while sticky inflation favors 2 or fewer cuts
  • Each scheduled monetary policy meeting and inflation data release between now and year-end 2026 creates decision points that could shift probabilities materially
  • Historical central bank behavior and forward guidance statements provide anchors, but unexpected economic shocks or external financial conditions could force revisions to the entire distribution

What moved the line

  • Jun 24Exactly 3 cuts7pp2821¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 25Exactly 5 cuts7pp2734¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 19Exactly 3 cuts6pp1319¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 21Exactly 3 cuts6pp2127¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 19Exactly 4 cuts6pp4741¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in fed rate

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in fed rate.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.