SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·2 source contracts·Kalshi 2·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2027 · 210d

Will Bitcoin be above $100000 by October 1, 2026 at 12:00AM ET

Leader sits at 21% across 2 bound outcomes, runner-up at 10%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

21%

Before January 2027

runner-up 10¢leader 21¢

Outcomes

2

winner-take-all

Runner-up

10¢

Before October 2026

Spread

11pp

contested

24h volume

$24K

liquid

Closes

Jan 1, 2027

210 days

Venue

Kalshi

2 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayBefore January 2027: 22% (31 days, 31 points)Before January 2027: 22% on 2026-06-05Before October 2026: 10% (31 days, 29 points)Before October 2026: 10% on 2026-06-05
Before January 202722¢Before October 202610¢
Top 2 candidates by current price · 31d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This represents a 37% chance that Bitcoin will trade above $100,000 at the start of October 2026, approximately five months from now. The probability suggests traders see near-term headwinds, evidenced by much lower probabilities for June and July targets (3¢ and 12¢ respectively), indicating they expect Bitcoin to remain below this threshold in the immediate term. However, the 42¢ probability for January 2027 suggests traders expect a meaningful recovery window between October and year-end. Bitcoin's price trajectory depends primarily on macroeconomic conditions, regulatory developments, and institutional adoption patterns. Key dates that could shift probabilities include Federal Reserve policy announcements and major cryptocurrency regulatory decisions. The current pricing implies traders view $100,000 as achievable but not highly likely within this specific five-month window, despite it being more probable by early 2027.

  • Bitcoin's current price relative to $100,000 and historical volatility patterns during similar timeframes
  • Probability decay across nearer dates (June at 3%, July at 12%, October at 29%) suggests structural bearishness in near-term expectations
  • Significant jump to 42% by January 2027 indicates traders expect recovery potential in Q4 2026
  • Trading volume concentration in June and July contracts ($34,663 and $27,441 daily volume) versus October ($10,297) suggests reduced conviction in the October target
  • Macroeconomic calendar events including interest rate decisions and inflation data between May and October that typically influence risk asset prices

What moved the line

  • May 29Before October 20265pp1419¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 4Before January 20275pp2823¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 1Before January 20274pp3329¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 2Before January 20274pp2925¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 1Before October 20263pp1714¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in bitcoin

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

Lateral coverage

Thin contract — here's where the deeper coverage is.

This page aggregates 2 contracts (21% headline). At low contract count, the price reflects two participants’ opinions, not a market consensus. The links below are heavier related questions where the orderbook signal is real.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.