SimpleFunctions
8 source contracts·Kalshi 8·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 7, 2027 · 112d

Will Julia Stiles win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

Liquidity-weighted aggregate sits at 9% across 8 Kalshi contracts.

Implied probability

9%
0%50%100%

Kalshi

9%

8 contracts

Polymarket

not bound

Cross-venue gap

single venue

24h move

no pin

24h volume

$295K

8 contracts

Closes

Jan 7, 2027

112 days

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAggregate: 15% (11 days, 11 points)Aggregate: 15% on 2026-09-12
Aggregate of 8 contracts · 11d

Bracket families

8 clusters across 8 contracts.

These contracts were grouped by title similarity. The headline aggregate combines all clusters; verify the cluster you actually need before quoting a number.

Cluster 1

Will Maura Higgins win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$107K

Cluster 2

Will Amber Glenn win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$34K

Cluster 3

Will Julia Stiles win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$32K

Cluster 4

Will Jenna Dewan win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$32K

Cluster 5

Will Harry Shum Jr. win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$25K

Cluster 6

Will Ezra Frech win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$25K

Cluster 7

Will Connor Wood win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$22K

Cluster 8

Will Jackson Olson win Dancing with the Stars Season 35

1 contract$17K

Analysis

This represents a prediction that Julia Stiles has an 11% chance of winning Dancing with the Stars Season 35. The probability reflects her relative positioning against other celebrity contestants, with Jenna Dewan currently favored at 25% and Harry Shum Jr. at 17%. Stiles' odds would shift based on early performance metrics—judge scores, audience voting patterns, and viewer engagement in the first few weeks of competition. The main catalyst for resolving uncertainty is the season's live performances and cumulative voting results as episodes air. Prediction markets typically adjust probabilities week-by-week based on actual dancing performance, audience sentiment, and betting activity from traders with relevant information. Stiles' previous acting career and public familiarity may influence baseline expectations, but on-show dance improvements and consistency matter significantly for probability movement.

  • Jenna Dewan is priced at 25%, nearly 2.5x higher than Julia Stiles at 10¢, indicating markets view Dewan as a stronger favorite based on perceived dance ability or public support
  • Week-to-week judge scores and viewer voting results directly correlate with probability shifts; early performance episodes typically produce significant repricing across contestant contracts
  • Harry Shum Jr. at 17% suggests contestants with prior dance training or performance experience are priced higher, which may disadvantage Stiles depending on her baseline skill level
  • Trading volume of $7,195 over 24 hours on Stiles' contract indicates moderate market liquidity and active reassessment as new competition information emerges
  • The spread between top candidates (Dewan 25¢ to Connor Wood 3¢) shows markets are still uncertain about Season 35 outcomes, with no contestant achieving dominant probability levels

What moved the line

  • Sep 11Harry Shum Jr.7pp2114¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 10Ezra Frech5pp127¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 12Jenna Dewan4pp1721¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 12Harry Shum Jr.3pp1417¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 10Connor Wood3pp74¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.