SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·2 source contracts·Kalshi 2·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 20, 2029 · 853d

Will Trump buy Greenland

Leader sits at 9% across 2 bound outcomes, runner-up at 3%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

9%

Before January 20, 2029

runner-up 3¢leader 9¢

Outcomes

2

winner-take-all

Runner-up

Before 2027

Spread

6pp

contested

24h volume

$69K

liquid

Closes

Jan 20, 2029

853 days

Venue

Kalshi

2 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayBefore January 20, 2029: 10% (18 days, 17 points)Before January 20, 2029: 10% on 2026-09-19Before 2027: 4% (18 days, 7 points)Before 2027: 4% on 2026-09-19
Before January 20, 202910¢Before 20274¢
Top 2 candidates by current price · 18d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This market reflects a 17% probability that the U.S. government will complete an acquisition of Greenland before January 20, 2029. The current level suggests traders view such a purchase as unlikely but not negligible given stated interest from the Trump administration. The probability would rise with explicit policy announcements, legislative action, or serious negotiations with Denmark; it would fall if officials distance themselves from the proposal or Denmark categorically rejects discussions. The most immediate catalyst is whether the administration pursues formal diplomatic channels or acquires political support in Congress—outcomes that could shift pricing substantially. A shorter-dated contract showing only 4% probability before 2027 indicates markets expect any purchase, if it occurs, to happen later in the presidential term. Resolution ultimately depends on whether actual negotiations materialize and, if so, whether they succeed.

  • Trump administration officials have publicly discussed Greenland acquisition; market pricing reflects whether this remains rhetorical or translates into formal policy
  • Denmark retains sovereignty and has stated opposition to selling; any purchase requires Danish government cooperation or extraordinary geopolitical circumstances
  • No binding legal or constitutional mechanism exists for U.S. territorial acquisition from allies; legislative action would be required
  • The 13-percentage-point spread between the 2027 and 2029 deadlines suggests most trader probability mass concentrates in years 2-3 of the term
  • Historical precedent for major territorial acquisitions between developed allies is absent in modern era, constraining baseline expectations

What moved the line

  • Sep 19Before January 20, 20296pp1610¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 17Before January 20, 20293pp1815¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in trump

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

Lateral coverage

Thin contract — here's where the deeper coverage is.

This page aggregates 2 contracts (9% headline). At low contract count, the price reflects two participants’ opinions, not a market consensus. The links below are heavier related questions where the orderbook signal is real.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.