SimpleFunctions
3 source contracts·Kalshi 3·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2028 · 470d

Will JPMorgan Chase serve as lead-left underwriter on OpenAI's IPO

Liquidity-weighted aggregate sits at 33% across 3 Kalshi contracts.

Implied probability

33%
0%50%100%

Kalshi

33%

3 contracts

Polymarket

not bound

Cross-venue gap

single venue

24h move

no pin

24h volume

$0

3 contracts

Closes

Jan 1, 2028

470 days

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAggregate: 52% (22 days, 22 points)Aggregate: 52% on 2026-09-12
Aggregate of 3 contracts · 22d

Bracket families

3 clusters across 3 contracts.

These contracts were grouped by title similarity. The headline aggregate combines all clusters; verify the cluster you actually need before quoting a number.

Cluster 1

Will Citigroup serve as lead-left underwriter on OpenAI's IPO

1 contract$0

Cluster 2

Will Goldman Sachs serve as lead-left underwriter on OpenAI's IPO

1 contract$0

Cluster 3

Will Morgan Stanley serve as lead-left underwriter on OpenAI's IPO

1 contract$0

Analysis

This contract estimates a 24% probability that JPMorgan Chase will be selected as the lead-left underwriter for OpenAI's initial public offering. The lead-left underwriter role is a prestigious position in IPO syndicates, typically awarded to one of the major investment banks based on relationships, track record, and negotiated terms. JPMorgan's probability reflects its status as a top-tier bank, though it trails Goldman Sachs (66¢) significantly in market expectations. The gap between JPMorgan and Goldman likely reflects Goldman's historical dominance in tech IPOs and any reported preferences OpenAI may have signaled. Resolution depends on OpenAI's formal IPO filing and syndicate announcement, which typically occurs when the company officially registers with the SEC. Trading volume on JPMorgan's contract ($418 in 24 hours) suggests moderate market interest relative to the Goldman contract's lower volume, possibly indicating lower confidence in JPMorgan's chances among active traders.

  • Goldman Sachs is priced at 66¢, commanding a substantial 42-percentage-point lead over JPMorgan, indicating market consensus favors Goldman for lead-left role
  • JPMorgan's 24¢ price sits between Morgan Stanley (20¢) and Citigroup (4¢), positioning it as the second-most-likely among remaining banks
  • No publicly announced OpenAI IPO filing or syndicate commitment has been disclosed, meaning resolution depends on a future formal announcement from OpenAI or its underwriters
  • JPMorgan's historical relationships with OpenAI (financing, advisory roles) versus Goldman's track record in similar tech-sector IPOs will influence the actual selection
  • The contract's $418 daily volume on JPMorgan versus $65 on Goldman suggests fewer traders are actively hedging JPMorgan's outcome, potentially indicating lower conviction in the alternatives

What moved the line

  • Sep 12Goldman Sachs27pp7952¢ · Kalshi
  • Sep 11Morgan Stanley3pp1815¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in ai tech

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in ai tech.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.