SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·3 source contracts·Kalshi 3·refreshed just now·Closes Dec 31, 2027 · 554d

Will US test scores in Math decline

Leader sits at 50% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 39%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

50%

No significant difference

runner-up 39¢leader 50¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

39¢

Significant decrease

Spread

11pp

contested

24h volume

$20

thin orderbook

Closes

Dec 31, 2027

554 days

Venue

Kalshi

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayNo significant difference: 47% (31 days, 28 points)No significant difference: 47% on 2026-06-25Significant decrease: 39% (31 days, 25 points)Significant decrease: 39% on 2026-06-25Significant increase: 8% (31 days, 8 points)Significant increase: 8% on 2026-06-18
No significant difference47¢Significant decrease39¢Significant increase8¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 31d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

The current 57% probability indicates that markets view a decline in US Math test scores as more likely than not over the specified timeframe. This assessment reflects ongoing concerns about educational outcomes, potential curriculum changes, and shifts in student preparation methods. The probability level suggests genuine uncertainty rather than consensus—nearly half the probability mass sits on no decline occurring. Key drivers include recent standardized test data trends, the implementation of new educational policies, and macroeconomic factors affecting school resources. Resolution will depend on official test score releases from organizations like NAEP or state education departments, which typically occur on announced schedules throughout 2026. The specific threshold and comparison period will determine whether this resolves affirmatively.

  • Historical trend direction: Recent NAEP and state standardized test results show whether Math scores have been declining, stable, or improving in the years leading to 2026
  • Policy and curriculum changes: Implementation of new educational standards, teaching methodologies, or assessment structures that could measurably affect performance
  • School resource allocation: Funding levels, teacher availability, and investment in STEM programs that directly influence instructional quality
  • Student demographics and test participation: Changes in the population taking tests and baseline preparation levels that affect aggregate score comparisons
  • Official data release dates: When authoritative test results become available to settle the prediction, typically through education department publications or NAEP reporting cycles

What moved the line

  • Jun 18No significant difference3pp5249¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 20No significant difference3pp4952¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 21Significant decrease3pp3835¢ · Kalshi
  • Jun 23Significant decrease3pp3639¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.