SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·4 source contracts·Kalshi 4·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 1, 2027 · 162d

Will the number of U.S. states that formally adopt a binding state-level moratorium on data-center development be at least 2 in 2026

Leader sits at 40% across 4 bound outcomes, runner-up at 22%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

40%

At least 2

runner-up 22¢leader 40¢

Outcomes

4

winner-take-all

Runner-up

22¢

At least 3

Spread

18pp

contested

24h volume

$5

thin orderbook

Closes

Jan 1, 2027

162 days

Venue

Kalshi

4 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAt least 2: 45% on 2026-07-21At least 3: 18% (2 days, 2 points)At least 3: 18% on 2026-07-22At least 4: 13% (2 days, 2 points)At least 4: 13% on 2026-07-22
At least 245¢At least 318¢At least 413¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 2d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This probability reflects market expectations that at least two U.S. states will formally adopt binding data-center development moratoriums by year-end 2026. The relatively modest 40% probability suggests significant skepticism about rapid legislative action, despite growing concerns about water usage, energy demand, and land consumption from artificial intelligence infrastructure. States would need to pass binding legislation—not mere studies or non-binding resolutions—within the remaining five months of 2026. The current market pricing indicates that while some states are discussing such measures, formal adoption faces hurdles including tech industry lobbying, power and water utility interests, and the complexity of drafting enforceable moratorium language. Any state passage of such legislation before January 2027 would be considered unusual given typical legislative timelines. The remainder of 2026 will likely determine whether momentum builds for data-center restrictions or whether economic development incentives prevail.

  • At least two states must pass binding legislation (not advisory measures or studies) formally restricting new data-center development by December 31, 2026
  • Current legislative activity in states discussing data-center restrictions and their proximity to formal votes will be observable through legislative tracking
  • Water availability concerns, particularly in western states, and energy grid capacity issues in targeted regions are measurable drivers of regulatory pressure
  • Tech industry and utility company lobbying intensity and political opposition to moratoriums can be tracked through disclosed advocacy spending and hearing records
  • The definition of 'binding' must exclude temporary freezes, permitting delays, or non-binding moratoriums—only formal legal restrictions count toward resolution

What moved the line

  • Jul 22At least 312pp3018¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in general

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Adjacent prediction questions.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.