SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·3 source contracts·Kalshi 3·refreshed just now·Closes Feb 1, 2027 · 221d

Will House Control be Democratic AND Senate Control be Republican for Feb 2027

Leader sits at 39% across 3 bound outcomes, runner-up at 37%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

39%

D-House, D-Senate

runner-up 37¢leader 39¢

Outcomes

3

winner-take-all

Runner-up

37¢

D-House, R-Senate

Spread

2pp

contested

24h volume

$25K

liquid

Closes

Feb 1, 2027

221 days

Venue

Kalshi

3 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayD-House, D-Senate: 39% (27 days, 10 points)D-House, D-Senate: 39% on 2026-06-19D-House, R-Senate: 37% (27 days, 15 points)D-House, R-Senate: 37% on 2026-06-23R-House, R-Senate: 22% (27 days, 19 points)R-House, R-Senate: 22% on 2026-06-25
D-House, D-Senate39¢D-House, R-Senate37¢R-House, R-Senate22¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 27d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

This 31% probability represents the chance that Democrats control the House while Republicans control the Senate in February 2027, following the 2026 midterm elections. The current level reflects relatively weak Democratic positioning in Senate races, where they defend numerous seats in competitive states, while House control remains more contested. Related market contracts show Republicans favored for Senate (19¢ for R-R split) and Democrats slightly ahead for holding both chambers (44¢ for D-D), suggesting a divided government is viewed as plausible but less likely than partisan sweeps. The key catalyst resolving this uncertainty is the November 2026 midterm election, which will determine actual seat distributions. Before then, polling trends, candidate recruitment, and spending patterns in competitive districts and states will gradually shift probabilities as clearer electoral dynamics emerge.

  • The 36¢ contract for D-House/R-Senate is currently the second-lowest probability among split-control scenarios, suggesting markets view this outcome as less likely than Republicans holding both chambers (19¢) or Democrats holding both (44¢)
  • Senate Democrats defend significantly more seats than Republicans in 2026, creating structural disadvantage in gaining majority while Republicans hold seats in competitive terrain
  • House control appears more volatile in market pricing relative to Senate, with Democratic seat-holding contracts ranging from 43¢ to 76¢ depending on threshold, indicating genuine uncertainty about chamber outcomes
  • The November 5, 2026 midterm election will be the primary data point resolving this question, with campaign performance metrics and polling through October providing leading indicators
  • Historical patterns show split-control outcomes relatively uncommon in midterms compared to unified sweeps, which may suppress this probability relative to pure probabilistic scenarios

Recently closed in election 2026

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in election 2026.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.