SimpleFunctions
Winner-take-all answer·7 source contracts·Kalshi 7·refreshed just now·Closes Jan 20, 2029 · 972d·5pp · 29h

Who will be Trump's next Director of National Intelligence

Leader sits at 34% across 7 bound outcomes, runner-up at 17%. This is a winner-take-all market — the headline is the leader’s price, not an arithmetic mean.

Leader probability

34%

Aaron Lukas

runner-up 17¢leader 34¢

Outcomes

7

winner-take-all

Runner-up

17¢

Devin Nunes

Spread

17pp

contested

24h volume

$20K

liquid

Closes

Jan 20, 2029

972 days

Venue

Kalshi

7 bound

30-day trend

0%50%100%-30d-3w-2w-1wtodayAaron Lukas: 31% (3 days, 3 points)Aaron Lukas: 31% on 2026-05-24Devin Nunes: 15% (3 days, 3 points)Devin Nunes: 15% on 2026-05-24Elise Stefanik: 15% (3 days, 3 points)Elise Stefanik: 15% on 2026-05-24
Aaron Lukas31¢Devin Nunes15¢Elise Stefanik15¢
Top 3 candidates by current price · 3d

Bracket family

How the bracket ladder is priced.

Each row is one outcome on the venue. Sorted by 24h volume — the heaviest book is at the top.

Analysis

Aaron Lukas currently leads the field at 29% probability to become Trump's next Director of National Intelligence, though the market is fragmented across seven candidates with no overwhelming favorite. Devin Nunes trails closely at 26%, suggesting uncertainty about Trump's intelligence leadership priorities. The outcome depends on Trump's personnel philosophy—whether he prioritizes loyalists with existing relationships like Nunes and Mike Flynn, or prefers candidates with intelligence community credentials like Lukas or Elise Stefanik at 18%. Ongoing developments in intelligence policy, classified information handling debates, and Trump's stated security priorities will likely influence these probabilities. Resolution timing remains uncertain, as director appointments typically occur during transition periods or vacancies, making this an extended-duration event where trader conviction remains moderate given the wide distribution of odds across candidates.

  • Aaron Lukas and Devin Nunes are separated by only 2 percentage points, indicating traders view them as genuinely competitive rather than one being dominant
  • Combined probability of all seven candidates totals 100%, with no single candidate commanding majority support, reflecting genuine uncertainty in the selection process
  • Kalshi volume is concentrated in top three candidates (Lukas, Nunes, Stefanik), suggesting lower conviction on remaining options
  • The 11-point gap between the leader (29%) and runner-up (22%) is narrow relative to winner-take-all stakes, indicating high residual uncertainty
  • Mike Flynn and Amaryllis Fox Kennedy combined represent only 11% probability despite their political profiles, suggesting market skepticism about their likelihood

What moved the line

  • May 23Michael Ellis11pp314¢ · Kalshi
  • May 23Devin Nunes9pp2718¢ · Kalshi
  • May 23Elise Stefanik5pp1914¢ · Kalshi
  • May 24Devin Nunes3pp1815¢ · Kalshi
  • May 23Richard Grenell3pp85¢ · Kalshi

Recently closed in trump

These markets stopped trading. Last odds and any captured outcome are shown above — full settlement detail lives at the venue.

More like this

Other questions in trump.

How we compute these odds

SimpleFunctions aggregates live prediction-market contracts from Kalshi and Polymarket. Each slug groups contracts that resolve on the same underlying event, identified by venue event_id.

For binary slugs, the headline probability is the liquidity-weighted mid-price across all bound contracts. For multi-outcome slugs (e.g. elections with 3+ candidates), the headline is the leader’s price; we never arithmetically average disjoint outcomes — that would produce a number with no real-world meaning.

Snapshots refresh every 5 minutes during market hours; daily aggregates are computed at 04:00 UTC. The 30-day sparkline is drawn from per-ticker daily means stored in market_indicator_daily; 24h delta and movement events are derived from the same source.

Last updated on this page: just now.